Literature DB >> 17371207

Waiting times for colonoscopy and colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Charlie H Viiala1, Kevin W Tang, Ian C Lawrance, Kevin Murray, John K Olynyk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether prolonged waiting times for colonoscopy in public hospitals could result in delayed diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Analysis of all outpatient colonoscopies performed at a Western Australian tertiary teaching hospital, 1 November 2003 - 31 October 2005. Colonoscopy data, corresponding pathological findings, category of urgency at referral for colonoscopy, and waiting time for colonoscopy were obtained. Patients were coded as having cancer if it was diagnosed by colonoscopy or if colonoscopy identified a lesion subsequently diagnosed as cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Colorectal carcinoma detected by outpatient colonoscopy and length of waiting time to colonoscopy.
RESULTS: 1632 outpatient colonoscopies were recorded. Category I patients received a colonoscopy within the recommended 30 days from referral. Median waiting times for Category II and Category III patients exceeded recommendations (observed, 113 days and 258 days; recommended, within 90 days and 180 days, respectively), although the number of cancers detected was low (2.4% and 0.6% of referrals, respectively in each category). Early- and late-stage cancers had similar median waiting times from referral to diagnosis. Age over 65 years and the blood-loss indications - a positive faecal occult blood test or iron deficiency/anaemia - were predictors of an increased risk of carcinoma at colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Waiting time for colonoscopy was not associated with an increase in the proportion of late-stage cancers diagnosed. Age over 65 years and evidence of blood loss increased the likelihood of a cancer diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17371207     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00901.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

1.  Is early colonoscopy after CT-diagnosed diverticulitis still necessary?

Authors:  Thomas Surya Suhardja; Shana Norhadi; Edward Zhenyu Seah; Stephen Rodgers-Wilson
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Potential impact of enhanced practice efficiency on endoscopy waiting times.

Authors:  G C Harewood; H Ryan; F Murray; S Patchett
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Optimizing Patient Risk Stratification for Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer: The Role for Linked Data.

Authors:  David B Preen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Hooi C Ee; Cameron Platell; Dayna R Cenin; Lakkhina Troeung; Max Bulsara; Peter O'Leary
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-09-08

4.  Is the patient activation measure associated with adherence to colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test result?

Authors:  Revital Azulay; Liora Valinsky; Fabienne Hershkowitz; Racheli Magnezi
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2018-12-21

5.  Repeated Automated Mobile Text Messaging Reminders for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Revital Azulay; Liora Valinsky; Fabienne Hershkowitz; Racheli Magnezi
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?

Authors:  Shawn Z Lee; Jonathon P Schubert; Simon J B Prowse; Robert V Bryant
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.611

7.  Will a flexi-sig' do? A retrospective review of colonoscopies indicated by diverticulitis alone.

Authors:  Matthew Leaning; William McSweeney; Darius Dastouri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.