Literature DB >> 16958883

Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?

Stephen F Chenoweth, Paul Doughty, Hanna Kokko.   

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated male mate choice for female ornaments in species without sex-role reversal. Despite these empirical findings, little is known about the adaptive dynamics of female signalling, in particular the evolution of male mating preferences. The evolution of traits that signal mate quality is more complex in females than in males because females usually provide the bulk of resources for the developing offspring. Here, we investigate the evolution of male mating preferences using a mathematical model which: (i) specifically accounts for the fact that females must trade-off resources invested in ornaments with reproduction; and (ii) allows male mating preferences to evolve a non-directional shape. The optimal adaptive strategy for males is to develop stabilizing mating preferences for female display traits to avoid females that either invests too many or too few resources in ornamentation. However, the evolutionary stability of this prediction is dependent upon the level of error made by females when allocating resources to either signal or fecundity.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16958883     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00867.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  21 in total

1.  Experimental evidence that female ornamentation increases the acquisition of sperm and signals fecundity.

Authors:  Charlie K Cornwallis; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Parental conflict and blue egg coloration in a seabird.

Authors:  Judith Morales; Roxana Torres; Alberto Velando
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-02

3.  The ornament-condition relationship varies with parasite abundance at population level in a female bird.

Authors:  Pablo Vergara; Jesús Martínez-Padilla; Stephen M Redpath; Francois Mougeot
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-08-20

4.  Sexual selection on multiple female ornaments in dance flies.

Authors:  Rosalind L Murray; Jill Wheeler; Darryl T Gwynne; Luc F Bussière
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.

Authors:  Thomas P Gosden; Adam J Reddiex; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reappraising sexual coevolution and the sex roles.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Alison Pischedda; Andrew D Stewart; William R Rice
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  A female signal reflects MHC genotype in a social primate.

Authors:  Elise Huchard; Michel Raymond; Julio Benavides; Harry Marshall; Leslie A Knapp; Guy Cowlishaw
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Mark A F Gillingham; David S Richardson; Hanne Løvlie; Anna Moynihan; Kirsty Worley; Tom Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Female competition and aggression: interdisciplinary perspectives.

Authors:  Paula Stockley; Anne Campbell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.