Celeste Leigh Pearce1, Karine Chung, Malcolm C Pike, Anna H Wu. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. cpearce@usc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has become increasingly clear that use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer; however, the effects by type of formulation and duration of use are less clear. A systematic review of the HT and ovarian cancer literature was conducted to identify population-based case-control studies, cohort studies, and randomized trials that examined effects by formulation of HT (estrogen-alone [ET] and estrogen plus progestin [EPT]) and duration of use. METHODS: Pub-Med (www.pubmed.gov) was used to identify relevant publications through December 2007; 14 studies were identified. The authors abstracted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in relation to duration of HT use (ET and EPT separately). The authors used the risk estimates per year of HT use if these were provided; otherwise, they calculated a duration-response for a log-linear model of the duration of HT use against risk. RESULTS: Ovarian cancer risk was increased among ET users (RR per 5 years of use, RR(5) = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.18-1.27; P < .0001), and a lower but still statistically significant increased risk was seen with EPT use (RR(5) = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16; P = .001). The increased risk in ET users was statistically significantly higher than the increased risk in EPT users (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: ET use increases risk of ovarian cancer in a duration-dependent manner, and it appears that the addition of progestins blocks this effect, at least to some extent. Whether the effect of estrogens would be completely blocked if progestins were given every day is unclear. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: It has become increasingly clear that use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer; however, the effects by type of formulation and duration of use are less clear. A systematic review of the HT and ovarian cancer literature was conducted to identify population-based case-control studies, cohort studies, and randomized trials that examined effects by formulation of HT (estrogen-alone [ET] and estrogen plus progestin [EPT]) and duration of use. METHODS: Pub-Med (www.pubmed.gov) was used to identify relevant publications through December 2007; 14 studies were identified. The authors abstracted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in relation to duration of HT use (ET and EPT separately). The authors used the risk estimates per year of HT use if these were provided; otherwise, they calculated a duration-response for a log-linear model of the duration of HT use against risk. RESULTS:Ovarian cancer risk was increased among ET users (RR per 5 years of use, RR(5) = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.18-1.27; P < .0001), and a lower but still statistically significant increased risk was seen with EPT use (RR(5) = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16; P = .001). The increased risk in ET users was statistically significantly higher than the increased risk in EPT users (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS:ET use increases risk of ovarian cancer in a duration-dependent manner, and it appears that the addition of progestins blocks this effect, at least to some extent. Whether the effect of estrogens would be completely blocked if progestins were given every day is unclear. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
Authors: James V Lacey; Louise A Brinton; Michael F Leitzmann; Traci Mouw; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Patricia Hartge Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Garnet L Anderson; Howard L Judd; Andrew M Kaunitz; David H Barad; Shirley A A Beresford; Mary Pettinger; James Liu; S Gene McNeeley; Ana Maria Lopez Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: G C Rodriguez; D K Walmer; M Cline; H Krigman; B A Lessey; R S Whitaker; R Dodge; C L Hughes Journal: J Soc Gynecol Investig Date: 1998 Sep-Oct
Authors: Marie Soegaard; Allan Jensen; Estrid Høgdall; Lise Christensen; Claus Høgdall; Jan Blaakaer; Susanne K Kjaer Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Joellen M Schildkraut; Lauren C Peres; Traci N Bethea; Fabian Camacho; Deanna Chyn; Emily K Cloyd; Elisa V Bandera; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Loren Lipworth; Charlotte E Joslin; Faith G Davis; Patricia G Moorman; Evan Myers; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Malcolm C Pike; Anna H Wu; Lynn Rosenberg Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Carol A Davis-Dao; Katherine D Henderson; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Huiyan Ma; Dee West; Yong-Bing Xiang; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Mariana C Stern; J Esteban Castelao; David V Conti; Malcolm C Pike; Leslie Bernstein; Victoria K Cortessis Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Hannah P Yang; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Britton Trabert; Gretchen L Gierach; Nicolas Wentzensen; Kathleen A Cronin; Mark E Sherman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark E Sherman; Richard Guido; Nicolas Wentzensen; Hannah P Yang; Phuong L Mai; Mark H Greene Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Karina E Hew; Philip C Miller; Dorraya El-Ashry; Jun Sun; Alexandra H Besser; Tan A Ince; Mengnan Gu; Zhi Wei; Gao Zhang; Patricia Brafford; Wei Gao; Yiling Lu; Gordon B Mills; Joyce M Slingerland; Fiona Simpkins Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Merlise A Clyde; Rachel Palmieri Weber; Edwin S Iversen; Elizabeth M Poole; Jennifer A Doherty; Marc T Goodman; Roberta B Ness; Harvey A Risch; Mary Anne Rossing; Kathryn L Terry; Nicolas Wentzensen; Alice S Whittemore; Hoda Anton-Culver; Elisa V Bandera; Andrew Berchuck; Michael E Carney; Daniel W Cramer; Julie M Cunningham; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Robert P Edwards; Brooke L Fridley; Ellen L Goode; Galina Lurie; Valerie McGuire; Francesmary Modugno; Kirsten B Moysich; Sara H Olson; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Malcolm C Pike; Joseph H Rothstein; Thomas A Sellers; Weiva Sieh; Daniel Stram; Pamela J Thompson; Robert A Vierkant; Kristine G Wicklund; Anna H Wu; Argyrios Ziogas; Shelley S Tworoger; Joellen M Schildkraut Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 4.897