OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify the spatial distribution of focal atrophy within mobility-related brain regions in relationship with quantitative gait characteristics. METHODS: Gray matter volume was obtained from 220 older adults (78.0 years old, 63% women, 77% white) for brain regions of five domains: motor (motor, sensorimotor and supplementary areas, basal ganglia, cerebellum), visuospatial attention (inferior and superior posterior parietal lobules), cognitive processing speed/executive control function (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), memory (hippocampus), and motor imagery (parahippocampus, posterior cingulated cortex) domains. Spatial (step width, step length) and temporal (double support time) gait characteristics were measured using the GaitMat II instrumented walking surface. Multivariable linear regression models were adjusted for demographics, total brain volume, and peripheral (body mass index, ankle-arm index, arthritis, vibratory sensation) and central (markers of diffuse brain structural abnormalities and of brain function) risk factors for gait impairment. RESULTS: Shorter steps and longer double support times were associated with smaller sensorimotor regions and also with smaller frontoparietal regions within the motor, visuospatial, and cognitive processing speed domains. The associations between wider step and smaller pallidum and inferior parietal lobule were less robust. None of the gait measures were associated with the cerebellum or with regions of the memory or motor imagery domains. CONCLUSIONS: Spatial and temporal characteristics of gait are associated with distinct brain networks in older adults. Addressing focal neuronal losses in these networks may represent an important strategy to prevent mobility disability.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify the spatial distribution of focal atrophy within mobility-related brain regions in relationship with quantitative gait characteristics. METHODS: Gray matter volume was obtained from 220 older adults (78.0 years old, 63% women, 77% white) for brain regions of five domains: motor (motor, sensorimotor and supplementary areas, basal ganglia, cerebellum), visuospatial attention (inferior and superior posterior parietal lobules), cognitive processing speed/executive control function (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), memory (hippocampus), and motor imagery (parahippocampus, posterior cingulated cortex) domains. Spatial (step width, step length) and temporal (double support time) gait characteristics were measured using the GaitMat II instrumented walking surface. Multivariable linear regression models were adjusted for demographics, total brain volume, and peripheral (body mass index, ankle-arm index, arthritis, vibratory sensation) and central (markers of diffuse brain structural abnormalities and of brain function) risk factors for gait impairment. RESULTS: Shorter steps and longer double support times were associated with smaller sensorimotor regions and also with smaller frontoparietal regions within the motor, visuospatial, and cognitive processing speed domains. The associations between wider step and smaller pallidum and inferior parietal lobule were less robust. None of the gait measures were associated with the cerebellum or with regions of the memory or motor imagery domains. CONCLUSIONS: Spatial and temporal characteristics of gait are associated with distinct brain networks in older adults. Addressing focal neuronal losses in these networks may represent an important strategy to prevent mobility disability.
Authors: A B Newman; L Shemanski; T A Manolio; M Cushman; M Mittelmark; J F Polak; N R Powe; D Siscovick Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Stephanie Studenski; Subashan Perera; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Anne B Newman Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: D Carmelli; C DeCarli; G E Swan; M Kelly-Hayes; P A Wolf; T Reed; J M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: R N Bryan; S W Wells; T J Miller; A D Elster; C A Jungreis; V C Poirier; B K Lind; T A Manolio Journal: Radiology Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: W T Longstreth; Alice M Arnold; Norman J Beauchamp; Teri A Manolio; David Lefkowitz; Charles Jungreis; Calvin H Hirsch; Daniel H O'Leary; Curt D Furberg Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jennifer C Davis; Lindsay S Nagamatsu; Chun Liang Hsu; B Lynn Beattie; Teresa Liu-Ambrose Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Neelesh K Nadkarni; Karen A Nunley; Howard Aizenstein; Tamara B Harris; Kristine Yaffe; Suzanne Satterfield; Anne B Newman; Caterina Rosano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Azizah J Jor'dan; Brad Manor; Ikechukwu Iloputaife; Daniel A Habtemariam; Jonathan F Bean; Farzaneh A Sorond; Lewis A Lipsitz Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Sara J Francois; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Sandra Gilmore; Subashan Perera; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: PM R Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 2.298