Tenille C Taggart1,2, Roger W Simmons3, Jennifer D Thomas1, Edward P Riley1. 1. Center for Behavioral Teratology , Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. 2. Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program , Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York. 3. Motor Control Laboratory , School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impaired motor function in children with histories of prenatal exposure to alcohol has been previously reported but, to date, no studies using quantitatively based analyses have been performed to assess gait in these children. METHODS: Gait of children with (n = 18) or without (n = 26) prenatal alcohol exposure was assessed using an electronically instrumented walkway. Children completed blocks of trials traversing the walkway with different combinations of walking condition (increased, self-paced, and decreased cadence) and direction (forward and backward). Gait velocity, cadence, stride length, step width, foot angle, and double support time, as well as the variability of these temporal-spatial markers, were used to assess gait. RESULTS: Results indicated that, in comparison with typically developing children, alcohol-exposed children produced exaggerated foot angle and increased step width. Additionally, alcohol-exposed children produced greater intrasubject variability of gait velocity and walking cadence while walking forward and backward, and greater variability in step width when walking backward and for all 3 walking conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that selected gait markers are adversely affected by prenatal exposure to alcohol. Clinicians and front-line personnel (e.g., teachers) should provide movement enriched experiences to help ameliorate these alcohol-related deficits.
BACKGROUND: Impaired motor function in children with histories of prenatal exposure to alcohol has been previously reported but, to date, no studies using quantitatively based analyses have been performed to assess gait in these children. METHODS: Gait of children with (n = 18) or without (n = 26) prenatal alcohol exposure was assessed using an electronically instrumented walkway. Children completed blocks of trials traversing the walkway with different combinations of walking condition (increased, self-paced, and decreased cadence) and direction (forward and backward). Gait velocity, cadence, stride length, step width, foot angle, and double support time, as well as the variability of these temporal-spatial markers, were used to assess gait. RESULTS: Results indicated that, in comparison with typically developing children, alcohol-exposed children produced exaggerated foot angle and increased step width. Additionally, alcohol-exposed children produced greater intrasubject variability of gait velocity and walking cadence while walking forward and backward, and greater variability in step width when walking backward and for all 3 walking conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that selected gait markers are adversely affected by prenatal exposure to alcohol. Clinicians and front-line personnel (e.g., teachers) should provide movement enriched experiences to help ameliorate these alcohol-related deficits.
Authors: Philip A May; Amy Baete; Jaymi Russo; Amy J Elliott; Jason Blankenship; Wendy O Kalberg; David Buckley; Marita Brooks; Julie Hasken; Omar Abdul-Rahman; Margaret P Adam; Luther K Robinson; Melanie Manning; H Eugene Hoyme Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: C Ryberg; E Rostrup; O B Paulson; F Barkhof; P Scheltens; E C W van Straaten; W M van der Flier; F Fazekas; R Schmidt; J M Ferro; H Baezner; T Erkinjuntti; H Jokinen; L-O Wahlund; A Poggesi; L Pantoni; D Inzitari; G Waldemar Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: James P Fitzpatrick; Jane Latimer; Maureen Carter; June Oscar; Manuela L Ferreira; Heather Carmichael Olson; Barbara R Lucas; Robyn Doney; Claire Salter; Julianne Try; Genevieve Hawkes; Emily Fitzpatrick; Marmingee Hand; Rochelle E Watkins; Alexandra L C Martiniuk; Carol Bower; John Boulton; Elizabeth J Elliott Journal: J Paediatr Child Health Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 1.954
Authors: Philip A May; Daniela Fiorentino; Giovanna Coriale; Wendy O Kalberg; H Eugene Hoyme; Alfredo S Aragón; David Buckley; Chandra Stellavato; J Phillip Gossage; Luther K Robinson; Kenneth Lyons Jones; Melanie Manning; Mauro Ceccanti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Roger W Simmons; Tenille C Taggart; Jennifer D Thomas; Sarah N Mattson; Edward P Riley Journal: Hum Mov Sci Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 2.161
Authors: Lisa M Savage; Polliana T Nunes; Zachary H Gursky; Katrina A Milbocker; Anna Y Klintsova Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 7.444