Literature DB >> 19125415

Low magnitude and high frequency mechanical loading prevents decreased bone formation responses of 2T3 preosteoblasts.

Mamta J Patel1, Kyungh Hwa Chang, Michelle C Sykes, Roger Talish, Clinton Rubin, Hanjoong Jo.   

Abstract

Bone loss due to osteoporosis or disuse such as in paraplegia or microgravity is a significant health problem. As a treatment for osteoporosis, brief exposure of intact animals or humans to low magnitude and high frequency (LMHF) mechanical loading has been shown to normalize and prevent bone loss. However, the underlying molecular changes and the target cells by which LMHF mechanical loading alleviate bone loss are not known. Here, we hypothesized that direct application of LMHF mechanical loading to osteoblasts alters their cell responses, preventing decreased bone formation induced by disuse or microgravity conditions. To test our hypothesis, preosteoblast 2T3 cells were exposed to a disuse condition using the random positioning machine (RPM) and intervened with an LMHF mechanical load (0.1-0.4 g at 30 Hz for 10-60 min/day). Exposure of 2T3 cells to the RPM decreased bone formation responses as determined by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralization even in the presence of a submaximal dose of BMP4 (20 ng/ml). However, LMHF mechanical loading prevented the RPM-induced decrease in ALP activity and mineralization. Mineralization induced by LMHF mechanical loading was enhanced by treatment with bone morphogenic protein 4 (BMP4) and blocked by the BMP antagonist noggin, suggesting a role for BMPs in this response. In addition, LMHF mechanical loading rescued the RPM-induced decrease in gene expression of ALP, runx2, osteomodulin, parathyroid hormone receptor 1, and osteoglycin. These findings suggest that preosteoblasts may directly respond to LMHF mechanical loading to induce differentiation responses. The mechanosensitive genes identified here provide potential targets for pharmaceutical treatments that may be used in combination with low level mechanical loading to better treat osteoporosis or disuse-induced bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19125415      PMCID: PMC2737721          DOI: 10.1002/jcb.22007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0730-2312            Impact factor:   4.429


  41 in total

1.  Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones.

Authors:  C Rubin; A S Turner; S Bain; C Mallinckrodt; K McLeod
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low-magnitude mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  C Rubin; G Xu; S Judex
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Effects of resistance and endurance exercise on bone mineral status of young women: a randomized exercise intervention trial.

Authors:  C Snow-Harter; M L Bouxsein; B T Lewis; D R Carter; R Marcus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts.

Authors:  T Komori; H Yagi; S Nomura; A Yamaguchi; K Sasaki; K Deguchi; Y Shimizu; R T Bronson; Y H Gao; M Inada; M Sato; R Okamoto; Y Kitamura; S Yoshiki; T Kishimoto
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-05-30       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Exercise and physical health: musculoskeletal health and functional capabilities.

Authors:  I Vuori
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling.

Authors:  C T Rubin; L E Lanyon
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1984-03-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Simulated microgravity using the Random Positioning Machine inhibits differentiation and alters gene expression profiles of 2T3 preosteoblasts.

Authors:  Steven J Pardo; Mamta J Patel; Michelle C Sykes; Manu O Platt; Nolan L Boyd; George P Sorescu; Min Xu; Jack J W A van Loon; May D Wang; Hanjoong Jo
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 4.249

8.  Age-associated decrease in muscle precursor cell differentiation.

Authors:  Simon J Lees; Christopher R Rathbone; Frank W Booth
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 4.249

9.  PTH-induced actin depolymerization increases mechanosensitive channel activity to enhance mechanically stimulated Ca2+ signaling in osteoblasts.

Authors:  Jinsong Zhang; Kimberly D Ryder; Jody A Bethel; Raymund Ramirez; Randall L Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Fractures caused by falling from a wheelchair in patients with neuromuscular disease.

Authors:  B Gray; J D Hsu; J Furumasu
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.449

View more
  19 in total

1.  Postural instability caused by extended bed rest is alleviated by brief daily exposure to low magnitude mechanical signals.

Authors:  Jesse Muir; Stefan Judex; Yi-Xian Qin; Clinton Rubin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 2.  Rodent models of aging bone: an update.

Authors:  Farhan A Syed; Terry Melim
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  The effects of vibration loading on adipose stem cell number, viability and differentiation towards bone-forming cells.

Authors:  Laura Tirkkonen; Heidi Halonen; Jari Hyttinen; Hannu Kuokkanen; Harri Sievänen; Anna-Maija Koivisto; Bettina Mannerström; George K B Sándor; Riitta Suuronen; Susanna Miettinen; Suvi Haimi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Cell Mechanosensitivity is Enabled by the LINC Nuclear Complex.

Authors:  Gunes Uzer; Clinton T Rubin; Janet Rubin
Journal:  Curr Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-02-01

5.  Osteoglycin and Bone-a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jakob Starup-Linde; Rikke Viggers; Aase Handberg
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Musculoskeletal response of dystrophic mice to short term, low intensity, high frequency vibration.

Authors:  S A Novotny; M D Eckhoff; B C Eby; J A Call; D Nuckley; D A Lowe
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  The potential benefits and inherent risks of vibration as a non-drug therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Ete Chan; Gunes Uzer; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Vibration Therapy to Prevent Bone Loss and Falls: Mechanisms and Efficacy.

Authors:  Belinda R Beck
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Mechanisms of gravitational sensitivity of osteogenic precursor cells.

Authors:  L B Buravkova; P M Gershovich; J G Gershovich; A I Grigor'ev
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.845

10.  Actin microfilament mediates osteoblast Cbfa1 responsiveness to BMP2 under simulated microgravity.

Authors:  Zhongquan Dai; Feng Wu; Jian Chen; Hongjie Xu; Honghui Wang; Feima Guo; Yingjun Tan; Bai Ding; Jinfu Wang; Yumin Wan; Yinghui Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.