Literature DB >> 24292612

Musculoskeletal response of dystrophic mice to short term, low intensity, high frequency vibration.

S A Novotny1, M D Eckhoff, B C Eby, J A Call, D Nuckley, D A Lowe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify parameters of low-intensity vibration that initiate the greatest osteogenic response in dystrophin-deficient mice and determine vibration safety for diseased muscle in three separate studies.
METHODS: Study1: Mdx mice were randomized into seven vibration treatments and 14 d later, plasma osteocalcin and tibial osteogenic gene expression were compared among treatments. Study2: Three days of vibration was compared to other modalities known to elicit muscle injury in mdx mice. Study3: Dystrophic mice with more severe phenotypes due to altered utrophin were subjected to 7 d vibration to determine if muscle injury was induced. Muscle torque and genes associated with inflammation and myogenesis were assessed in Studies 2-3.
RESULTS: Two sets of parameters (45 Hz 0.6 g and 90 Hz 0.6 g) evoked osteogenic responses. 45 Hz upregulated alkaline phosphatase and tended to upregulate osteoprotegerin without altering RANKL, and 90 Hz simultaneously upregulated osteprotegerin and RANKL. Thus, subsequent muscle studies utilized 45 Hz. Vibration for 3 or 7 d was not injurious to dystrophic muscle as shown by the lack of differences between vibrated and non-vibrated mice in torque and gene expression.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that vibration at 45 Hz and 0.6 g is safe for dystrophic muscle and may be a therapeutic modality to improve musculoskeletal health in DMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24292612      PMCID: PMC7071346     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact        ISSN: 1108-7161            Impact factor:   2.041


  45 in total

1.  Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR.

Authors:  Michael W Pfaffl; Graham W Horgan; Leo Dempfle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions.

Authors:  Kate Ward; Chrissie Alsop; Janette Caulton; Clinton Rubin; Judith Adams; Zulf Mughal
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  The effect of whole body vibration exposure on muscle or bone morphology and function in older adults: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Monica Mikhael; Rhonda Orr; Maria A Fiatarone Singh
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effect of low-magnitude, high-frequency vibration on osteocytes in the regulation of osteoclasts.

Authors:  Esther Lau; Saja Al-Dujaili; Axel Guenther; Dawei Liu; Liyun Wang; Lidan You
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Adaptive strength gains in dystrophic muscle exposed to repeated bouts of eccentric contraction.

Authors:  Jarrod A Call; Michael D Eckhoff; Kristen A Baltgalvis; Gordon L Warren; Dawn A Lowe
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-09-29

6.  Effects of prednisolone on skeletal muscle contractility in mdx mice.

Authors:  Kristen A Baltgalvis; Jarrod A Call; Jason B Nikas; Dawn A Lowe
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Constrained tibial vibration does not produce an anabolic bone response in adult mice.

Authors:  Blaine A Christiansen; Akhilesh A Kotiya; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Bone mineral density and bone metabolism in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  M L Bianchi; A Mazzanti; E Galbiati; S Saraifoger; A Dubini; F Cornelio; L Morandi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Muscle damage and repair in voluntarily running mice: strain and muscle differences.

Authors:  A Irintchev; A Wernig
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  High-frequency, low-magnitude vibration does not prevent bone loss resulting from muscle disuse in mice following botulinum toxin injection.

Authors:  Sarah L Manske; Craig A Good; Ronald F Zernicke; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Regenerative and Rehabilitative Medicine: A Necessary Synergy for Functional Recovery from Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury.

Authors:  Sarah M Greising; Christopher L Dearth; Benjamin T Corona
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.481

2.  Low intensity, high frequency vibration training to improve musculoskeletal function in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Susan A Novotny; Tara L Mader; Angela G Greising; Angela S Lin; Robert E Guldberg; Gordon L Warren; Dawn A Lowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Feasibility and tolerability of whole-body, low-intensity vibration and its effects on muscle function and bone in patients with dystrophinopathies: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anna Petryk; Lynda E Polgreen; Molly Grames; Dawn A Lowe; James S Hodges; Peter Karachunski
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Differential effects of low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on reloading hind-limb soleus and gastrocnemius medialis muscles in 28-day tail-suspended rats.

Authors:  K T Sun; K S Leung; P M F Siu; L Qin; W H Cheung
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.041

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.