Literature DB >> 19122792

Statistical learning of origin-specific statically optimal individualized treatment rules.

Mark J van der Laan1, Maya L Petersen.   

Abstract

Consider a longitudinal observational or controlled study in which one collects chronological data over time on a random sample of subjects. The time-dependent process one observes on each subject contains time-dependent covariates, time-dependent treatment actions, and an outcome process or single final outcome of interest. A statically optimal individualized treatment rule (as introduced in van der Laan et. al. (2005), Petersen et. al. (2007)) is a treatment rule which at any point in time conditions on a user-supplied subset of the past, computes the future static treatment regimen that maximizes a (conditional) mean future outcome of interest, and applies the first treatment action of the latter regimen. In particular, Petersen et. al. (2007) clarified that, in order to be statically optimal, an individualized treatment rule should not depend on the observed treatment mechanism. Petersen et. al. (2007) further developed estimators of statically optimal individualized treatment rules based on a past capturing all confounding of past treatment history on outcome. In practice, however, one typically wishes to find individualized treatment rules responding to a user-supplied subset of the complete observed history, which may not be sufficient to capture all confounding. The current article provides an important advance on Petersen et. al. (2007) by developing locally efficient double robust estimators of statically optimal individualized treatment rules responding to such a user-supplied subset of the past. However, failure to capture all confounding comes at a price; the static optimality of the resulting rules becomes origin-specific. We explain origin-specific static optimality, and discuss the practical importance of the proposed methodology. We further present the results of a data analysis in which we estimate a statically optimal rule for switching antiretroviral therapy among patients infected with resistant HIV virus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causal inference; counterfactual; double robust estimating function; dynamic treatment regime; history-adjusted marginal structural model; inverse probability weighting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 19122792      PMCID: PMC2613337          DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  8 in total

1.  Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology.

Authors:  J M Robins; M A Hernán; B Brumback
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  Comparison of dynamic treatment regimes via inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Emilie Lanoy; Dominique Costagliola; James M Robins
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.080

3.  History-adjusted marginal structural models for estimating time-varying effect modification.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Steven G Deeks; Jeffrey N Martin; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Demystifying optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Erica E M Moodie; Thomas S Richardson; David A Stephens
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment and intention to treat rules.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes.

Authors:  S A Murphy; M J van der Laan; J M Robins
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 7.  Treatment of antiretroviral-drug-resistant HIV-1 infection.

Authors:  Steven G Deeks
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Individualized treatment rules: generating candidate clinical trials.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Steven G Deeks; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Individualized treatment rules: generating candidate clinical trials.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Steven G Deeks; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Marginal Structural Models with Counterfactual Effect Modifiers.

Authors:  Wenjing Zheng; Zhehui Luo; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.829

Review 4.  A scoping review of studies using observational data to optimise dynamic treatment regimens.

Authors:  Maarten J IJzerman; Julie A Simpson; Robert K Mahar; Myra B McGuinness; Bibhas Chakraborty; John B Carlin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.