Literature DB >> 17450501

Individualized treatment rules: generating candidate clinical trials.

Maya L Petersen1, Steven G Deeks, Mark J van der Laan.   

Abstract

Individualized treatment rules, or rules for altering treatments over time in response to changes in individual covariates, are of primary importance in the practice of clinical medicine. Several statistical methods aim to estimate the rule, termed an optimal dynamic treatment regime, which will result in the best expected outcome in a population. In this article, we discuss estimation of an alternative type of dynamic regime-the statically optimal treatment rule. History-adjusted marginal structural models (HA-MSM) estimate individualized treatment rules that assign, at each time point, the first action of the future static treatment plan that optimizes expected outcome given a patient's covariates. However, as we discuss here, HA-MSM-derived rules can depend on the way in which treatment was assigned in the data from which the rules were derived. We discuss the conditions sufficient for treatment rules identified by HA-MSM to be statically optimal, or in other words, to select the optimal future static treatment plan at each time point, regardless of the way in which past treatment was assigned. The resulting treatment rules form appropriate candidates for evaluation using randomized controlled trials. We demonstrate that a history-adjusted individualized treatment rule is statically optimal if it depends on a set of covariates that are sufficient to control for confounding of the effect of past treatment history on outcome. Methods and results are illustrated using an example drawn from the antiretroviral treatment of patients infected with HIV. Specifically, we focus on rules for deciding when to modify the treatment of patients infected with resistant virus. Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17450501      PMCID: PMC2442037          DOI: 10.1002/sim.2888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

Review 1.  Invited commentary: propensity scores.

Authors:  M M Joffe; P R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A dynamic adaptation of the propensity score adjustment for effectiveness analyses of ordinal doses of treatment.

Authors:  A C Leon; T I Mueller; D A Solomon; M B Keller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001 May 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Comparison of dynamic treatment regimes via inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Emilie Lanoy; Dominique Costagliola; James M Robins
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.080

5.  History-adjusted marginal structural models for estimating time-varying effect modification.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Steven G Deeks; Jeffrey N Martin; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment and intention to treat rules.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Statistical learning of origin-specific statically optimal individualized treatment rules.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes.

Authors:  S A Murphy; M J van der Laan; J M Robins
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Treatment of antiretroviral-drug-resistant HIV-1 infection.

Authors:  Steven G Deeks
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

1.  Statistical learning of origin-specific statically optimal individualized treatment rules.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Petersen et al. Respond to "Effect Modification by Time-varying Covariates"

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Dynamic models for estimating the effect of HAART on CD4 in observational studies: Application to the Aquitaine Cohort and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mélanie Prague; Daniel Commenges; Jon Michael Gran; Bruno Ledergerber; Jim Young; Hansjakob Furrer; Rodolphe Thiébaut
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Comparative effectiveness of dynamic treatment regimes: an application of the parametric g-formula.

Authors:  Jessica G Young; Lauren E Cain; James M Robins; Eilis J O'Reilly; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2011-09-01

6.  Marginal Structural Models with Counterfactual Effect Modifiers.

Authors:  Wenjing Zheng; Zhehui Luo; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.829

Review 7.  A scoping review of studies using observational data to optimise dynamic treatment regimens.

Authors:  Maarten J IJzerman; Julie A Simpson; Robert K Mahar; Myra B McGuinness; Bibhas Chakraborty; John B Carlin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.