OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of an analysis of symptoms alone for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence. DESIGN: A comparison of results of symptoms analysis with urodynamic findings. SETTING: A gynaecological video-urodynamic unit. SUBJECTS: 252 consecutive patients referred for urodynamic investigations. INTERVENTIONS: A questionnaire of 20 symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction, midstream specimen of urine, pad testing, uroflowmetry, and video-cystourethrography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using the urodynamic diagnosis as the 'gold standard', the accuracy of discriminant function analysis of symptoms was determined. RESULTS: Symptoms analysis achieved a correct classification of 81% with a false positive rate of 16%. Use of an accumulative probability curve defines patients who fall into the equivocal range. CONCLUSIONS: All women presenting with incontinence should undergo preoperative urodynamic studies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of an analysis of symptoms alone for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence. DESIGN: A comparison of results of symptoms analysis with urodynamic findings. SETTING: A gynaecological video-urodynamic unit. SUBJECTS: 252 consecutive patients referred for urodynamic investigations. INTERVENTIONS: A questionnaire of 20 symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction, midstream specimen of urine, pad testing, uroflowmetry, and video-cystourethrography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using the urodynamic diagnosis as the 'gold standard', the accuracy of discriminant function analysis of symptoms was determined. RESULTS: Symptoms analysis achieved a correct classification of 81% with a false positive rate of 16%. Use of an accumulative probability curve defines patients who fall into the equivocal range. CONCLUSIONS: All women presenting with incontinence should undergo preoperative urodynamic studies.