Literature DB >> 9891961

The Larsson frequency/volume chart is not a substitute for cystometry in the investigation of women with urinary incontinence.

D G Tincello1, D H Richmond.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the ability of the Larsson chart nomogram to predict the presence of detrusor instability or genuine stress incontinence without recourse to cystometry. The Larsson chart provides a probability of detrusor instability by plotting 24-hour urinary frequency against the range of void volumes. Frequency/volume chart data were obtained from the records of 216 patients who had undergone subtraction cystometry. The Larsson chart was assessed by comparing the probability of detrusor instability or of genuine stress incontinence obtained with the cystometric diagnosis. The maximum sensitivity of the Larsson chart was 52%, with a specificity of 70% for detrusor instability. For genuine stress incontinence these figures were 66% and 65% respectively. The Larsson chart provides no diagnostic information and does not remove the need for formal cystometric evaluation of patients with urinary incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9891961     DOI: 10.1007/bf02199573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  13 in total

1.  Frequency volume charts: an indispensable part of lower urinary tract assessment.

Authors:  P Abrams; B Klevmark
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1996

2.  Incontinence history as a predictor of detrusor stability.

Authors:  P K Sand; R C Hill; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology.

Authors:  P Abrams; J G Blaivas; S L Stanton; J T Andersen
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1988

4.  Urinary incontinence: correlation of history and brief office evaluation with multichannel urodynamic testing.

Authors:  R L Summitt; T G Stovall; A E Bent; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity: cohort study.

Authors:  N Black; J Griffiths; C Pope; A Bowling; P Abel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-12-06

6.  Usefulness of urodynamic investigations in female incontinence.

Authors:  X De Muylder; H Claes; P Neven; K De Jaegher
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1992-05-13       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 7.  The role of patient history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  J K Jensen; F R Nielsen; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Symptoms analysis for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence.

Authors:  E Versi; L Cardozo; D Anand; D Cooper
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-08

9.  Reliability of the patient's history in the diagnosis of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A Bergman; K Bader
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  The diagnostic value of history, physical examination, and the Q-tip cotton swab test in women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  M D Walters; L E Shields
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.