Literature DB >> 19495550

Qualifying a quantitative approach to women's expectations of continence surgery.

Sushma Srikrishna1, Dudley Robinson, Linda Cardozo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study is to explore expectations and goals of women undergoing continence surgery using a combined quantitative and qualitative approach.
METHODS: Women with urinary incontinence, recruited from the waiting list, were assessed with a structured clinical interview, and these data were transcribed and analysed thematically (grounded theory). The Kings Health Questionnaire (KHQ) was used to determine incontinence impact on patient's life.
RESULTS: Incontinence was objectively quantified using videocystourethrography. KHQ quantitative analysis suggested that the main domains affected were incontinence impact on life and physical limitations. However, qualitative analysis based on the interview found women were most affected by incontinence impact on physical or social limitation, sexual function, emotions and body image.
CONCLUSION: Whilst disease-specific QoL questionnaires allow broad comparisons to be made assessing patient bother; they lack sensitivity to assess individual symptoms. A qualitative approach may individualize patient care and improve patient satisfaction and overall outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19495550     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0870-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  16 in total

1.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  EGGS for patient-centered outcomes.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Bob Shull
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-04-12

3.  Outcome measures in urogynaecology: the clinicians' perspective.

Authors:  Dudley Robinson; Kate Anders; Linda Cardozo; John Bidmead
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06-28

4.  How much is enough and who says so?

Authors:  Con J Kelleher; Andreas M Pleil; Pat Ray Reese; Somali Misra Burgess; Paul H Brodish
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Patient-selected goals: the fourth dimension in assessment of pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Lior Lowenstein; Mary P FitzGerald; Kimberly Kenton; Yashika Dooley; Mike Templehof; Elizabeth R Mueller; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-05-12

6.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of women with pelvic floor dysfunction: patient centered goals at 1 year.

Authors:  Kathie L Hullfish; Viktor E Bovbjerg; Matthew J Gurka; William D Steers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Important clinical outcomes in urogynecology: views of patients, nurses and medical staff.

Authors:  D G Tincello; Z Alfirevic
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002

8.  Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome.

Authors:  Eman A Elkadry; Kimberly S Kenton; Mary P FitzGerald; Susan Shott; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery.

Authors:  Sangeeta T Mahajan; Eman A Elkadry; Kimberly S Kenton; Susan Shott; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Kathie L Hullfish; Viktor E Bovbjerg; William D Steers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  6 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcome measures which assess body image in urogynaecology patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas G Gray; Rosanna Sneyd; Kaia Scurr; Georgina L Jones; David Iles; Swati Jha; Stephen C Radley
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Can sex survive pelvic floor surgery?

Authors:  Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo; Juan Gonzalez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Urinary Incontinence and Psychosocial Factors Associated With Intimate Relationship Satisfaction Among Midlife Women.

Authors:  Lori Saiki; Robin Meize-Grochowski
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2017-05-04

4.  Discrepancies between patient-reported outcome measures when assessing urinary incontinence or pelvic-prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Michael Due Larsen; Gunnar Lose; Rikke Guldberg; Kim Oren Gradel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Neurogenic mechanisms in bladder and bowel ageing.

Authors:  Richard N Ranson; M Jill Saffrey
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.277

6.  A meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with urinary incontinence: 'is it just part and parcel of life?'

Authors:  Francine Toye; Karen L Barker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.264

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.