Literature DB >> 19104844

Symptom-monitoring behaviors of rural cancer patients and survivors.

Carol J Hermansen-Kobulnicky1.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: Symptom monitoring is described among rural cancer patients and survivors with comparison across study variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous survey was mailed to adult cancer patients and survivors. Sampling was via a cancer center serving a region of a US rural-frontier state. Symptom monitoring was measured as keeping written track of symptoms, side effects, trends in how one is feeling, and/or limits to what one can do. MAIN
RESULTS: Useable response rate was 60.4% (134/222). Respondents were on average 62.3 years old, 53.0% were female, and 52.3% had earned less than a college degree. Breast (30.6%) and prostate (28.4%) cancers were most common. Symptom monitoring was reported and confirmed via tracking means, by 32.1% of respondents. Symptom monitoring was associated with "shared" or "passive" symptom management decisions, keeping written track of questions to ask providers and answers received, report of fatigue, and having received the suggestion or advice on how to monitor. Symptom monitoring was not associated with age, education, sex, number of symptoms, or being given something with which to monitor.
CONCLUSIONS: Symptom monitoring apart from intervention appears common among rural cancer patients and survivors. Findings support using multi-dimensional ways to inquire of, and refer to, such behavior. Data show symptom monitoring is more common among those suffering cancer-related fatigue, indicating opportunities for intervention to optimize monitoring for improved outcomes. Findings also suggest symptom-monitoring patients may rely on, or interact more with, providers regarding symptom management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19104844     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-008-0552-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  39 in total

Review 1.  Triple jeopardy: rural, poor, and uninsured.

Authors:  D Rowland; B Lyons
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  A concept analysis of self-monitoring.

Authors:  Mary H Wilde; Suzanne Garvin
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Patient use of the symptom reporting tool.

Authors:  R A Tucci; K L Bartels
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.027

4.  Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; T R Mendoza; X S Wang; C Chou; M T Harle; M Morrissey; M C Engstrom
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The diary as a means of understanding the quality of life of persons with cancer receiving home nursing care.

Authors:  D M Oleske; S Heinze; D M Otte
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 6.  Choosing outcome variables: global assessment and diaries.

Authors:  Bruce D Naliboff
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  MRC quality of life studies using a daily diary card--practical lessons learned from cancer trials.

Authors:  P Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Mail-in questionnaire for monitoring nausea and vomiting in oncology outpatients.

Authors:  S M Mullin; D M Fletcher; L S Tyler
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 2.637

9.  Patients' need for information about cancer therapy.

Authors:  Karen A Skalla; Marie Bakitas; Charlotte T Furstenberg; Tim Ahles; Joseph V Henderson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  T F Hack; L F Degner; D G Dyck
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Internet interventions for improving psychological well-being in psycho-oncology: review and recommendations.

Authors:  Yan Leykin; Seema M Thekdi; Dianne M Shumay; Ricardo F Muñoz; Michelle Riba; Laura B Dunn
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Randomized Prospective Trial Exploring the Impact of Structured Journaling in Patients With Sarcoma on the Management of Treatment-Related Adverse Events.

Authors:  N J Speece; Menglin Xu; Gabriel Tinoco; David A Liebner; James L Chen
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-09-24

3.  Are rural Ohio Appalachia cancer survivors needs different than urban cancer survivors?

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Paul L Reiter; Sandy Corbin; Janet S de Moor; Electra D Paskett; Charles L Shapiro
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Probing the benefits of real-time tracking during cancer care.

Authors:  Rupa A Patel; Predrag Klasnja; Andrea Hartzler; Kenton T Unruh; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

Review 5.  Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Claire F Snyder; Amy P Abernethy; Ethan Basch; Arnold L Potosky; Aaron C Roberts; Deena R Loeffler; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Digital Patient Platform During Oncology Treatment.

Authors:  Melissa De Regge; Elsie Decoene; Kristof Eeckloo; Ann Van Hecke
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2019-01-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.