Mary H Wilde1, Suzanne Garvin. 1. University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA. mary_wilde@urmc.rochester.edu [corrected]
Abstract
AIM: This paper reports a concept analysis delineating and clarifying the concept of self-monitoring to facilitate development and evaluation of interventions to enhance self-monitoring. BACKGROUND: The concepts of self-monitoring, self-management, self-care and symptom management are often used in similar or interchangeable ways. Clarification of the concept of self-monitoring is needed for research and theory development. METHOD: Rodgers and Knafl's evolutionary concept analysis process was used to delineate and clarify the concept. The PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched using keywords 'self-monitoring', 'self-management' and 'self-care' (with and without the hyphen) for the years 1998-2005, to update a previous study (not published). Later, searching was refined and the keyword 'self-monitoring' was paired with 'awareness' and 'self-regulation' was added. Approximately half the papers were from nursing (n = 34) and half from other disciplines (n = 32). The sample from 1998 to 2005 was further stratified by chronic condition. Definition, exemplars, usage, attributes, antecedents/consequences and implications for further study were identified. FINDINGS: Self-monitoring was composed of two complementary components (attributes): (1) awareness of bodily symptoms, sensations, daily activities, and cognitive processes and (2) measurements, recordings and observations that inform cognition or provide information for independent action or consultation with care providers. CONCLUSION: Self-monitoring may be an important concept for understanding how people self-manage chronic conditions. This concept analysis may be useful for researchers who wish to measure this dimension and to develop nursing theory in this area.
AIM: This paper reports a concept analysis delineating and clarifying the concept of self-monitoring to facilitate development and evaluation of interventions to enhance self-monitoring. BACKGROUND: The concepts of self-monitoring, self-management, self-care and symptom management are often used in similar or interchangeable ways. Clarification of the concept of self-monitoring is needed for research and theory development. METHOD: Rodgers and Knafl's evolutionary concept analysis process was used to delineate and clarify the concept. The PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched using keywords 'self-monitoring', 'self-management' and 'self-care' (with and without the hyphen) for the years 1998-2005, to update a previous study (not published). Later, searching was refined and the keyword 'self-monitoring' was paired with 'awareness' and 'self-regulation' was added. Approximately half the papers were from nursing (n = 34) and half from other disciplines (n = 32). The sample from 1998 to 2005 was further stratified by chronic condition. Definition, exemplars, usage, attributes, antecedents/consequences and implications for further study were identified. FINDINGS: Self-monitoring was composed of two complementary components (attributes): (1) awareness of bodily symptoms, sensations, daily activities, and cognitive processes and (2) measurements, recordings and observations that inform cognition or provide information for independent action or consultation with care providers. CONCLUSION: Self-monitoring may be an important concept for understanding how people self-manage chronic conditions. This concept analysis may be useful for researchers who wish to measure this dimension and to develop nursing theory in this area.
Authors: Mary H Wilde; James M McMahon; Wan Tang; Margaret V McDonald; Judith Brasch; Eileen Fairbanks; Shivani Shah Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Mary H Wilde; James M McMahon; Eileen Fairbanks; Judith Brasch; Robert Parshall; Feng Zhang; Sarah Miner; Deborah Thayer; Dan Schneiderman; Brian Harrington Journal: J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Date: 2016 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.741
Authors: Katherine A Yeager; Claire E Sterk; Tammie E Quest; Colleen DiIorio; Catherine Vena; Susan Bauer-Wu Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2016 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Mary H Wilde; Hugh F Crean; James M McMahon; Margaret V McDonald; Wan Tang; Judith Brasch; Eileen Fairbanks; Shivani Shah; Feng Zhang Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2016 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.381