Literature DB >> 19102596

The emotional harbinger effect: poor context memory for cues that previously predicted something arousing.

Mara Mather1, Marisa Knight.   

Abstract

A key function of memory is to use past experience to predict when something important might happen next. Indeed, cues that previously predicted arousing events (emotional harbingers) garner more attention than other cues. However, the current series of five experiments demonstrates that people have poorer memory for the context of emotional harbinger cues than of neutral harbinger cues. Participants first learned that some harbinger cues (neutral tones or faces) predicted emotionally arousing pictures and others predicted neutral pictures. Then they studied associations between the harbinger cues and new contextual details. They were worse at remembering associations with emotional harbingers than with neutral harbingers. Memory was impaired not only for the association between emotional harbingers and nearby digits, but also for contextual details that overlapped with or were intrinsic to the emotional harbingers. However, new cues that were inherently emotionally arousing did not yield the same memory impairments as the emotional harbingers. Thus, emotional harbinger cues seem to suffer more from proactive interference than do neutral harbinger cues, impairing formation of new associations with cues that previously predicted something arousing. 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19102596      PMCID: PMC2728072          DOI: 10.1037/a0014087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  52 in total

1.  Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory.

Authors:  S Hamann
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: empirical evidence and theoretical implications.

Authors:  Peter F Lovibond; David R Shanks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2002-01

3.  Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward.

Authors:  John P O'Doherty; Ralf Deichmann; Hugo D Critchley; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Implicit memory is not immune to interference.

Authors:  C Lustig; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval.

Authors:  L J KLEINSMITH; S KAPLAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-02

Review 6.  Interference and time: a brief review and an integration.

Authors:  Martha Escobar; Francisco Arcediano; Tyson L Platt; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.353

Review 7.  Predicting danger: the nature, consequences, and neural mechanisms of predictive fear learning.

Authors:  Gavan P McNally; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 8.  What's elementary about associative learning?

Authors:  E A Wasserman; R R Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  The impact of stress on neutral and emotional aspects of episodic memory.

Authors:  Jessica D Payne; Eric D Jackson; Lee Ryan; Siobhan Hoscheidt; Jake W Jacobs; Lynn Nadel
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-01

10.  Observational fear conditioning in the acquisition and extinction of attentional bias for threat: an experimental evaluation.

Authors:  Megan M Kelly; John P Forsyth
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2007-05
View more
  22 in total

1.  Both younger and older adults have difficulty updating emotional memories.

Authors:  Kaoru Nashiro; Michiko Sakaki; Derek Huffman; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 2.  The slow forgetting of emotional episodic memories: an emotional binding account.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Maureen Ritchey
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Unitization mitigates interference by intrinsic negative emotion in familiarity and recollection of associative memory: Electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Meng Han; Xinrui Mao; Nika Kartvelishvili; Wen Li; Chunyan Guo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Updating existing emotional memories involves the frontopolar/orbito-frontal cortex in ways that acquiring new emotional memories does not.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Kazuhisa Niki; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Emotion enhances the subjective feeling of remembering, despite lower accuracy for contextual details.

Authors:  Ulrike Rimmele; Lila Davachi; Radoslav Petrov; Sonya Dougal; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-06

6.  GANEing traction: The broad applicability of NE hotspots to diverse cognitive and arousal phenomena.

Authors:  Mara Mather; David Clewett; Michiko Sakaki; Carolyn W Harley
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Association learning for emotional harbinger cues: when do previous emotional associations impair and when do they facilitate subsequent learning of new associations?

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Alexandra E Ycaza-Herrera; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-10-07

8.  Reconciling findings of emotion-induced memory enhancement and impairment of preceding items.

Authors:  Marisa Knight; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-12

9.  The tenacious nature of memory binding for arousing negative items.

Authors:  Deanna L Novak; Mara Mather
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

10.  High reward makes items easier to remember, but harder to bind to a new temporal context.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Esther Fujiwara; Bridgette C Gerson; Jeremy B Caplan
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.