Literature DB >> 21568639

Updating existing emotional memories involves the frontopolar/orbito-frontal cortex in ways that acquiring new emotional memories does not.

Michiko Sakaki1, Kazuhisa Niki, Mara Mather.   

Abstract

In life, we must often learn new associations to people, places, or things we already know. The current fMRI study investigated the neural mechanisms underlying emotional memory updating. Nineteen participants first viewed negative and neutral pictures and learned associations between those pictures and other neutral stimuli, such as neutral objects and encoding tasks. This initial learning phase was followed by a memory updating phase, during which participants learned picture-location associations for old pictures (i.e., pictures previously associated with other neutral stimuli) and new pictures (i.e., pictures not seen in the first phase). There was greater frontopolar/orbito-frontal (OFC) activity when people learned picture-location associations for old negative pictures than for new negative pictures, but frontopolar OFC activity did not significantly differ during learning locations of old versus new neutral pictures. In addition, frontopolar activity was more negatively correlated with the amygdala when participants learned picture-location associations for old negative pictures than for new negative or old neutral pictures. Past studies revealed that the frontopolar OFC allows for updating the affective values of stimuli in reversal learning or extinction of conditioning [e.g., Izquierdo, A., & Murray, E. A. Opposing effects of amygdala and orbital PFC lesions on the extinction of instrumental responding in macaque monkeys. European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 2341-2346, 2005]; our findings suggest that it plays a more general role in updating associations to emotional stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568639      PMCID: PMC3203542          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  59 in total

1.  Extinction learning in humans: role of the amygdala and vmPFC.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Phelps; Mauricio R Delgado; Katherine I Nearing; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Mining the posterior cingulate: segregation between memory and pain components.

Authors:  Finn Arup Nielsen; Daniela Balslev; Lars Kai Hansen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Reconciling the roles of orbitofrontal cortex in reversal learning and the encoding of outcome expectancies.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Michael P Saddoris; Thomas A Stalnaker
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Cytology and functionally correlated circuits of human posterior cingulate areas.

Authors:  Brent A Vogt; Leslie Vogt; Steven Laureys
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

7.  Neural correlates of relational memory: successful encoding and retrieval of semantic and perceptual associations.

Authors:  Steven E Prince; Sander M Daselaar; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Thickness of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in humans is correlated with extinction memory.

Authors:  Mohammed R Milad; Brian T Quinn; Roger K Pitman; Scott P Orr; Bruce Fischl; Scott L Rauch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration.

Authors:  Donna Rose Addis; Alana T Wong; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Human orbitofrontal cortex mediates extinction learning while accessing conditioned representations of value.

Authors:  Jay A Gottfried; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  12 in total

1.  Both younger and older adults have difficulty updating emotional memories.

Authors:  Kaoru Nashiro; Michiko Sakaki; Derek Huffman; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Differential brain activity during emotional versus nonemotional reversal learning.

Authors:  Kaoru Nashiro; Michiko Sakaki; Lin Nga; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Threat of punishment motivates memory encoding via amygdala, not midbrain, interactions with the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Vishnu P Murty; Kevin S Labar; R Alison Adcock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Attenuating age-related learning deficits: emotional valenced feedback interacts with task complexity.

Authors:  Marissa A Gorlick; Gyslain Giguère; Brian D Glass; Brittany N Nix; Mara Mather; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-11-19

5.  Association learning for emotional harbinger cues: when do previous emotional associations impair and when do they facilitate subsequent learning of new associations?

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Alexandra E Ycaza-Herrera; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-10-07

6.  The long rather than the short allele of 5-HTTLPR predisposes Han Chinese to anxiety and reduced connectivity between prefrontal cortex and amygdala.

Authors:  Haixia Long; Bing Liu; Bing Hou; Chao Wang; Jin Li; Wen Qin; Dawei Wang; Yuan Zhou; Keith M Kendrick; Chunshui Yu; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Brain substrates of recovery from misleading influence.

Authors:  Micah G Edelson; Yadin Dudai; Raymond J Dolan; Tali Sharot
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  High reward makes items easier to remember, but harder to bind to a new temporal context.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Esther Fujiwara; Bridgette C Gerson; Jeremy B Caplan
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-27

9.  Age-related similarities and differences in brain activity underlying reversal learning.

Authors:  Kaoru Nashiro; Michiko Sakaki; Lin Nga; Mara Mather
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-30

10.  Not all that glittered is gold: neural mechanisms that determine when reward will enhance or impair memory.

Authors:  David V Clewett; Mara Mather
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.