PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a predictor of response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognostic factor for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study retrospectively evaluated 352 locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by surgery. Serum CEA levels were determined before CRT administration (pre-CRT CEA) and before surgery (post-CRT CEA). Correlations between pre-CRT CEA levels and rates of good response (Tumor regression grade 3/4) were explored. Patients were categorized into three CEA groups according to their pre-/post-CRT CEA levels (ng/mL) (Group A: pre-CRT CEA <or= 3; B: pre-CRT CEA >3, post-CRT CEA <or=3; C: pre- and post-CRT CEA >3 ng/mL), and their oncologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 352 patients, good responses were achieved in 94 patients (26.7%). The rates of good response decreased significantly as the pre-CRT CEA levels became more elevated (CEA [ng/mL]: <or=3, 36.4%; 3-6, 23.6%; 6-9, 15.6%; >9, 7.8%; p < 0.001). The rates of good response were significantly higher in Group A than in Groups B and C (36.4% vs. 17.3% and 14.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was significantly better in Groups A and B than in Group C (82% and 79% vs. 57%, respectively; p = 0.005); the CEA grouping was identified as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In locally advanced rectal cancer patients, CEA levels could be of clinical value as a predictor of response to preoperative CRT and as an independent prognostic factor after preoperative CRT and curative surgery.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a predictor of response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognostic factor for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study retrospectively evaluated 352 locally advanced rectal cancerpatients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by surgery. Serum CEA levels were determined before CRT administration (pre-CRT CEA) and before surgery (post-CRT CEA). Correlations between pre-CRT CEA levels and rates of good response (Tumor regression grade 3/4) were explored. Patients were categorized into three CEA groups according to their pre-/post-CRT CEA levels (ng/mL) (Group A: pre-CRT CEA <or= 3; B: pre-CRT CEA >3, post-CRT CEA <or=3; C: pre- and post-CRT CEA >3 ng/mL), and their oncologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 352 patients, good responses were achieved in 94 patients (26.7%). The rates of good response decreased significantly as the pre-CRT CEA levels became more elevated (CEA [ng/mL]: <or=3, 36.4%; 3-6, 23.6%; 6-9, 15.6%; >9, 7.8%; p < 0.001). The rates of good response were significantly higher in Group A than in Groups B and C (36.4% vs. 17.3% and 14.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was significantly better in Groups A and B than in Group C (82% and 79% vs. 57%, respectively; p = 0.005); the CEA grouping was identified as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In locally advanced rectal cancerpatients, CEA levels could be of clinical value as a predictor of response to preoperative CRT and as an independent prognostic factor after preoperative CRT and curative surgery.
Authors: Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Aparna Balachandran; Mediha Ahmad; Jeffrey E Lee; Sunil Krishnan; Huamin Wang; Christopher H Crane; Robert A Wolff; Gauri R Varadhachary; Peter W T Pisters; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H G Katz Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Jong Wan Kim; Hyun Chul Kim; Ji Won Park; Sung Chan Park; Dae Kyung Sohn; Hyo Seong Choi; Dae Yong Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Ji Yeon Baek; Sun Young Kim; Seok Ki Kim; Jae Hwan Oh Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 2.571