Literature DB >> 19096552

A Multi-center Clinical Study of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with the Expandable Stand-alone Cage (Tyche(R) Cage) for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disorders.

Jin Wook Kim1, Hyung Chun Park, Seung Hwan Yoon, Seong Hoon Oh, Sung Woo Roh, Dae Cheol Rim, Tae Sung Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This multi-center clinical study was designed to determine the long-term results of patients who received a one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with expandable cage (Tyche(R) cage) for degenerative spinal diseases during the same period in each hospital.
METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with low back pain who had a one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion using a newly designed expandable cage were enrolled in this study at five centers from June 2003 to December 2004 and followed up for 24 months. Pain improvement was checked with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and their disability was evaluated with the Oswestry Disability Index. Radiographs were obtained before and after surgery. At the final follow-up, dynamic stability, quality of bone fusion, interveretebral disc height, and lumbar lordosis were assessed. In some cases, a lumbar computed tomography scan was also obtained.
RESULTS: The mean VAS score of back pain was improved from 6.44 points preoperatively to 0.44 at the final visit and the score of sciatica was reduced from 4.84 to 0.26. Also, the Oswestry Disability Index was improved from 32.62 points preoperatively to 18.25 at the final visit. The fusion rate was 92.5%. Intervertebral disc height, recorded as 9.94+/-2.69 mm before surgery was increased to 12.23+/-3.31 mm at postoperative 1 month and was stabilized at 11.43+/-2.23 mm on final visit. The segmental angle of lordosis was changed significantly from 3.54+/-3.70 degrees before surgery to 6.37+/-3.97 degrees by 24 months postoperative, and total lumbar lordosis was 20.37+/-11.30 degrees preoperatively and 24.71+/-11.70 degrees at 24 months postoperative.
CONCLUSION: There have been no special complications regarding the expandable cage during the follow-up period and the results of this study demonstrates a high fusion rate and clinical success.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degeneration; Expandable cage; Interbody fusion; Lumbar spine

Year:  2007        PMID: 19096552      PMCID: PMC2588207          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2007.42.4.251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  36 in total

Review 1.  Interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operations on the spine.

Authors:  P C McAfee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages: an independent review of 71 cases.

Authors:  S Agazzi; A Reverdin; D May
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Compressive strength of interbody cages in the lumbar spine: the effect of cage shape, posterior instrumentation and bone density.

Authors:  B Jost; P A Cripton; T Lund; T R Oxland; K Lippuner; P Jaeger; L P Nolte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Objective measurement of the height of lumbar intervertebral disks from lateral roentgen views of the spine].

Authors:  W Frobin; P Brinckmann; M Biggemann
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

5.  The Ray Threaded Fusion Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  S T Onesti; E Ashkenazi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Lumbar lordosis measurement. A new method versus Cobb technique.

Authors:  K V Chernukha; R H Daffner; D H Reigel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Threaded fusion cage for lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  J Mizuno; H Nakagawa
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population.

Authors:  P G Korovessis; M V Stamatakis; A G Baikousis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effect of operative position and short-segment fusion on maintenance of sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  C B Tribus; T A Belanger; T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Health-related quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury: review of the short form 36-health questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Revision strategies for ventral implant failure in the lumbar spine exemplified by stand-alone cages].

Authors:  T Tarhan; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The safety and efficacy of cadaveric allografts and titanium cage as a fusion substitutes in pyogenic osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Kim; Je-Il Ryu; Koang Hum Bak
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-10-31

3.  Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  M Formica; D Vallerga; A Zanirato; L Cavagnaro; M Basso; S Divano; L Mosconi; E Quarto; G Siri; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-01-01

4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral facetectomy and interbody fusion using expandable cages for lumbosacral foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Jin Hoon Park; Chae Wan Bae; Sang Ryong Jeon; Seung Chul Rhim; Chang Jin Kim; Sung Woo Roh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-12-31

5.  Bidirectional Expandable Technology for Transforaminal or Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis of Safety and Performance.

Authors:  Domagoj Coric; Raphael R Roybal; Mark Grubb; Vincent Rossi; Alex K Yu; Isaac R Swink; Jason Long; Boyle C Cheng; Jason A Inzana
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

6.  Mid-term Clinical Outcomes of Stand-alone Posterior Interbody Fusion with Rectangular Cages: A 4-year-minimum Follow-up.

Authors:  Kyung Rae Cho; Sun-Ho Lee; Eun Sang Kim; Whan Eoh
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-09-30

7.  Can posterior stand-alone expandable cages safely restore lumbar lordosis? A minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Seung-Kook Kim; Ogeil Mubarak Elbashier; Su-Chan Lee; Woo-Jin Choi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Stand-Alone Posterior Expandable Cage Technique for Adjacent Segment Degeneration with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Woo-Jin Choi; Seung-Kook Kim; Manhal Alaraj; Hyeun-Sung Kim; Su-Chan Lee
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.