Literature DB >> 19095624

Activity-based electrical stimulation training in a stroke patient with minimal movement in the paretic upper extremity.

Stephen J Page1, Samantha Maslyn, Valerie Hill Hermann, Andy Wu, Kari Dunning, Peter G Levine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Existing task-specific practice interventions do not increase movement in stroke patients exhibiting minimal distal movement in the paretic upper extremity. Although often used, an important limitation of conventional electrical stimulation is that it does not involve task-specific practice.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of an activity-specific electrical stimulation program on paretic limb impairment, functional limitation, and ability to perform valued activities in a subacute stroke patient exhibiting minimal paretic wrist and hand movement.
METHOD: A female subject exhibiting trace paretic hand and finger movement was administered, 9 months after stroke, the upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer Impairment Scale (FM), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT). She then engaged in paretic upper extremity, task-specific training incorporating an electrical stimulation neuroprosthesis. Training occurred 3 hours per day, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. The FM, ARAT, and AMAT were again administered.
RESULTS: After intervention, she exhibited reduced impairment (evidenced by an FM score change of 22 to 29), decreased functional limitation (evidenced by an ARAT score change of 4 to 10), and increased ability and speed in performing valued AMAT activities. She also reported using the paretic hand and fingers more and new abilities to perform valued activities such as playing piano.
CONCLUSION: Although conventional paretic upper extremity training strategies are ineffective in patients at this level, electrical stimulation training incorporating a neuroprosthesis appears promising.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19095624     DOI: 10.1177/1545968308329922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  5 in total

1.  Training-induced modifications of corticospinal reactivity in severely affected stroke survivors.

Authors:  Ruth N Barker; Sandra G Brauer; Benjamin K Barry; Toby J Gill; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cyclic functional electrical stimulation does not enhance gains in hand grasp function when used as an adjunct to onabotulinumtoxinA and task practice therapy: a single-blind, randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Douglas J Weber; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Christian Niyonkuru; Chia-Lin Chang; Lynne M Huber; Michael C Munin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke.

Authors:  Alexander B Remsik; Peter L E van Kan; Shawna Gloe; Klevest Gjini; Leroy Williams; Veena Nair; Kristin Caldera; Justin C Williams; Vivek Prabhakaran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Combining Brain-Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges.

Authors:  J D R Millán; R Rupp; G R Müller-Putz; R Murray-Smith; C Giugliemma; M Tangermann; C Vidaurre; F Cincotti; A Kübler; R Leeb; C Neuper; K-R Müller; D Mattia
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to improve motor function and grip force of upper limbs of patients with hemiplegia.

Authors:  Poopak Motamed Vaziri; Farid Bahrpeyma; Mohammad Firoozabadi; Bijan Forough; Boshra Hatef; Rahman Sheikhhoseini; Aryan Shamili
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 0.611

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.