Literature DB >> 19093104

Bimanual 1:1 with 90 degrees continuous relative phase: difficult or easy!

Attila J Kovacs1, John J Buchanan, Charles H Shea.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present experiment was to observe the performance of participants attempting to produce a 1:1 bimanual coordination pattern with 90 degrees relative phase between the arms when feedback concerning the movement of the two limbs was integrated within a Lissajous plot and when this information was withdrawn. One group was paced with an auditory metronome and the other was encouraged to increase frequency when they fell below the goal frequency. We predicted that providing a salient integrated feedback display without a metronome would allow participants to effectively tune-in the goal relative phase pattern within several minutes; instead of several days as typically found in the literature when the metronome was used. The data indicated remarkably effective performances after 5 min of practice when the metronome was not used, with motion of both limbs harmonic in nature, and continuous relative phase errors (approximately 10 degrees) and standard deviation of continuous relative phase (approximately 10 degrees) relatively small. This seems remarkable given that this coordination pattern has proven relatively difficult to perform under normal and Lissajous feedback conditions even after several days of practice. As predicted relative phase errors and variability increased substantially when the metronome was used. When the extrinsic feedback was withdrawn all participants tended to drift from the required 90 degrees relative phase, but the cycle duration variability in the two limbs remained stable and limb motion remained harmonic in nature. The current findings suggest that some of the difficulty typically associated with producing various relative phase patterns is due to the less than optimal perceptual information available in the various testing situations and the use of pacing metronomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19093104     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1676-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination.

Authors:  F Mechsner; D Kerzel; G Knoblich; W Prinz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements.

Authors:  Steven W Kennerley; Jörn Diedrichsen; Eliot Hazeltine; Andras Semjen; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Relative Phase Alterations During Bimanual Skill Acquisition.

Authors:  T. D. Lee; S. P. Swinnen; S. Verschueren
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  The influence of augmented feedback and prior learning on the acquisition of a new bimanual coordination pattern.

Authors:  Sarah R Hurley; Timothy D Lee
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Moving farther but faster: an exception to Fitts's law.

Authors:  Jos J Adam; Robin Mol; Jay Pratt; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

6.  Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns.

Authors:  R J Fontaine; T D Lee; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1997-03

7.  AGE-RELATED DEFICITS IN MOTOR LEARNING AND DIFFERENCES IN FEEDBACK PROCESSING DURING THE PRODUCTION OF A BIMANUAL COORDINATION PATTERN.

Authors:  Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Posturally induced transitions in rhythmic multijoint limb movements.

Authors:  J J Buchanan; J A Kelso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Preferential coupling between voluntary movements of ipsilateral limbs.

Authors:  F Baldissera; P Cavallari; P Civaschi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1982-12-23       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Visual perception of the relative phasing of human limb movements.

Authors:  G P Bingham; R C Schmidt; F T Zaal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02
View more
  43 in total

1.  Bimanual Fitts' tasks: Kelso, Southard, and Goodman, 1979 revisited.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Jason Boyle; Attila J Kovacs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation to novel visuo-motor transformations: further evidence of functional haptic neglect.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Katrin Rapp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Observation and physical practice: different practice contexts lead to similar outcomes for the acquisition of kinematic information.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Inchon Park
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-19

Review 5.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

6.  Amplitude differences, spatial assimilation, and integrated feedback in bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Bimanual force control: cooperation and interference?

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Jason B Boyle; Chaoyi Wang; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-07

8.  Facilitation and interference during the preparation of bimanual movements: contributions from starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-12

9.  The perception-action dynamics of action competency are altered by both physical and observational training.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jorge Ramos; Nina Robson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of integrated feedback on discrete bimanual movements in choice reaction time.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Guilherme de Cellio Martins; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.