Literature DB >> 10378663

The effect of membrane permeability on ESRD: design of a prospective randomised multicentre trial.

F Locatelli1, T Hannedouche, S Jacobson, G La Greca, A Loureiro, A Martin-Malo, M Papadimitriou, R Vanholder.   

Abstract

The different permeability of high-flux and low-flux dialysis membranes results in different removal capacity, particularly for uremic toxins of middle and large molecular weight. High-flux dialysers have been evaluated in clinical and epidemiological studies for their effect on mortality, morbidity, dialysis-related amyloidosis, nutritional status, response to erythropoietin treatment, dialysis tolerance and the preservation of residual renal function. Many of these studies, however, lack a prospective design and randomised treatment allocation, or have too few patients and too short a follow-up. Therefore, this clinical trial was designed to prospectively investigate the long-term effect of membrane permeability on clinical outcome in a larger number of patients. The primary objective is to compare the effect of membrane permeability on mortality of patients on bicarbonate hemodialysis and treated with a minimum dialysis dose. Patients included in the study should have been on hemodialysis for no longer than one month and have serum albumin 4 g/dl or lower. Patients will be randomised to either the experimental or the control group. During the four-week run-in period the treatment parameters will be established in order to achieve the required dialysis dose. During the maintenance period of three to five years regular visits are scheduled to record clinical and laboratory parameters, to measure Kt/V and to adapt the treatment parameters. Altogether a minimum of 660 patients should be enrolled within a two-year recruitment period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10378663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  6 in total

Review 1.  Home haemodialysis and uraemic toxin removal: does a happy marriage exist?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Sunny Eloot; Nathalie Neirynck; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Jonathan C Craig; Paul J Roderick; Francesco Locatelli; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 3.  An update on uremic toxins.

Authors:  N Neirynck; R Vanholder; E Schepers; S Eloot; A Pletinck; G Glorieux
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Effect of membrane permeability on survival of hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Francesco Locatelli; Alejandro Martin-Malo; Thierry Hannedouche; Alfredo Loureiro; Menelaos Papadimitriou; Volker Wizemann; Stefan H Jacobson; Stanislaw Czekalski; Claudio Ronco; Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 5.  What is new in uremic toxicity?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Steven Van Laecke; Griet Glorieux
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  The best dialysis therapy? Results from an international survey among nephrology professionals.

Authors:  Ingrid Ledebo; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-09-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.