Literature DB >> 19091901

Does 18F-FDG PET/CT improve the detection of posttreatment recurrence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in patients negative for disease on clinical follow-up?

Ronan Abgral1, Solène Querellou, Gaël Potard, Pierre-Yves Le Roux, Alexandra Le Duc-Pennec, Remi Marianovski, Olivier Pradier, Yves Bizais, Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré, Pierre Y Salaun.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Posttreatment surveillance for the recurrence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a diagnostic challenge. Tissue distortion from radiation and surgery can obscure early detection of recurrence by conventional follow-up approaches such as physical examination, CT, and MRI. Several studies have shown that 18F-FDG PET may be an effective technique for the detection of persistent, recurrent, and distant metastatic HNSCC after treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the benefits of hybrid 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting a subclinical locoregional recurrence of HNSCC and distant metastases. The study patients were considered cured of HNSCC on the basis of 12 mo of negative findings on conventional follow-up. We also assessed the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in these patients.
METHODS: Ninety-one patients cured of HNSCC without any clinical evidence of recurrence were included. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT examination was performed 11.6+/-4.4 mo after the end of the treatment. The gold standard was histopathology or 6 mo of imaging follow-up.
RESULTS: The whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations had negative results in 52 patients and positive results in 39. Nine of these patients who exhibited abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in the head and neck area did not have recurrent HNSCC (false-positive). Thirty had proven recurrence. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT in this study for the diagnosis of HNSCC recurrence were 100% (30/30) and 85% (52/61), respectively. The positive predictive value was 77% (30/39). The negative predictive value was 100% (52/52). The overall accuracy was 90% (82/91).
CONCLUSION: The results of our study confirm the high effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of HNSCC recurrence and suggest that 18F-FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional follow-up physical examination alone in the assessment of recurrence after previous curative treatment for HNSCC and could be proposed systematically at 12 mo of the usual follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19091901     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  61 in total

Review 1.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT to assess response and guide risk-stratified follow-up after chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Bird; Sally Barrington; Selvam Thavaraj; Jean-Pierre Jeannon; Andrew Lyons; Richard Oakley; Ricard Simo; Mary Lei; Teresa Guerrero Urbano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Predictive value of pre-therapy (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the outcome of (18)F-FDG PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  M Picchio; M Kirienko; P Mapelli; I Dell'Oca; E Villa; F Gallivanone; L Gianolli; C Messa; I Castiglioni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Positron emission tomography for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  Anthony Visioni; Julian Kim
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging and ultrasound in surveillance of head and neck cancer - The 3-year experience of the ENT Department in Poznan.

Authors:  Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Mariola Popko; Karolina Piskadło; Rafał Czepczyński; Aleksandra Stankowska; Tomasz Piętka; Mirosław Dziuk; Witold Szyfter
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-09-29

6.  Regulation of glycolysis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Dhruv Kumar
Journal:  Postdoc J       Date:  2017-01

7.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vasavi Paidpally; Alin Chirindel; Stella Lam; Nishant Agrawal; Harry Quon; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2012-12

9.  PET/MRI and PET/CT in follow-up of head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Marcelo A Queiroz; Martin Hüllner; Felix Kuhn; Gerhardt Huber; Christian Meerwein; Spyros Kollias; Gustav von Schulthess; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Clinical Applications of FDG PET and PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Akram Al-Ibraheem; Andreas Buck; Bernd Joachim Krause; Klemens Scheidhauer; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.