| Literature DB >> 19087298 |
Nadia Carla Cheik1, Elizeu Antônio Rossi, Ricardo Luís Fernandes Guerra, Neuli Maria Tenório, Cláudia Maria Oller do Nascimento, Fabiana Pavan Viana, Marla Simone Jovenasso Manzoni, Iracilda Zeponni Carlos, Patrícia Leão da Silva, Regina Célia Vendramini, Ana Raimunda Dâmaso.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Available data on the effects of a fermented soy product enriched with Enterococcus faecium and Lactobacillus Jugurti on circulating lipids and adiposity are not completely settled. This study aimed to observe the effects of a fermented soy product enriched with Enterococcus faecium and Lactobacillus Jugurti on central obesity and dyslipidemia control in Wistar adult male rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19087298 PMCID: PMC2628905 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-7-50
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Body weight gain (%) and the total food intake (g) in rats fed different diets during 8 weeks.
| Group | Body weight gain | Total food intake |
| C | 64.06 ± 4.18 | 1108 ± 55.04 |
| CPF | 73.55 ± 1.99 | 1193 ± 21.84 |
| H | 94.86 ± 3.64+ | 1405 ± 33.64+ |
| HPF | 77.44 ± 2.26* | 1250 ± 34.50* |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 8).*p < 0.05 comparing C × CPF and H × HPF; +p < 0.05 comparing C × H. Control Group (C); Control + Fermented Product Group (CPF); Hypercholesterolemic Diet Group (H); and Hypercholesterolemic + Fermented Product Group (HPF).
Absolute (g) and Relative (g/100 g b.w) weight of the Retroperitoneal and Epididymal White Adipose Tissue in rats fed different diets during 8 weeks.
| Retroperitoneal | Epididymal | |||
| Absolute | Relative | Absolute | Relative | |
| C | 3.73 ± 0.29 | 0.87 ± 0.06 | 3.20 ± 0.40 | 1.23 ± 0.05 |
| CPF | 4.28 ± 0.34 | 1.02 ± 0.07 | 4.63 ± 0.33* | 1.01 ± 0.07 |
| H | 5.34 ± 0.76 | 1.09 ± 0.17+ | 4.17 ± 0.43+ | 0.90 ± 0.08+ |
| HPF | 3.55 ± 0.43* | 0.88 ± 0,09* | 2.40 ± 0.14* ° | 0.66 ± 0.04* |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 8).*p < 0.05 comparing C × CPF and H × HPF; +p < 0.05 comparing C × H; °p < 0.05 comparing CPF × HPF. Control Group (C); Control + Fermented Product Group (CPF); Hypercholesterolemic Diet Group (H); and Hypercholesterolemic + Fermented Product Group (HPF).
Circumference (μm) of the adipocyte from Retroperitoneal (RET) and Epididymal (EPI) White Adipose Tissue in rats fed different diets during 8 weeks.
| Circumference | ||
| Group | RET | EPI |
| C | 127.35 ± 2.49 | 128.25 ± 2.05 |
| CPF | 118.06 ± 1.75* | 110.13 ± 1.42* |
| H | 138.59 ± 2.37+ | 122.69 ± 1.73 |
| HPF | 113.49 ± 2.03* | 100.12 ± 1.42* |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 8).*p < 0.05 comparing C × CPF and H × HPF; +p < 0.05 comparing C × H. Control Group (C); Control + Fermented Product Group (CPF); Hypercholesterolemic Diet Group (H); and Hypercholesterolemic + Fermented Product Group (HPF).
Figure 1Circumference (μm) of the adipocyte from Retroperitoneal (RET) White Adipose Tissue in rats fed different diets during 8 weeks. Values are means ± SEM (n = 8). A – Control Group (C): circumference = 127.35 ± 2.49 μm. B – Control + Fermented Product Group (CPF): circumference = 118.06 ± 1.75* μm. C – Hypercholesterolemic Diet Group (H): circumference = 138.59 ± 2.37+ μm. D – Hypercholesterolemic + Fermented Product Group (HPF): circumference = 113.49 ± 2.03* μm. *p < 0.05 comparing C × CPF and H × HPF; +p < 0.05 comparing C × H.
Figure 2Circumference (μm) of the adipocyte from Epididymal (EPI) White Adipose Tissue in rats fed different diets during 8 weeks. Values are means ± SEM (n = 8). A – Control Group (C): circumference = 128.25 ± 2.05 μm. B – Control + Fermented Product Group (CPF): circumference = 110.13 ± 1.42* μm. C – Hypercholesterolemic Diet Group (H): circumference = 122.69 ± 1.73 μm. D – Hypercholesterolemic + Fermented Product Group (HPF): circumference = 110.12 ± 1.42* μm. *p < 0.05 comparing C × CPF and H × HPF.
In vivo lipogenesis rate (μmol of 3H2O incorporated into lipid per gram of tissue per hour) in RET, EPI and liver in rats fed different diets during 8 weeks.
| Groups | RET | EPI | Liver |
| C | 1,34 ± 0,29 | 0,59 ± 0,11 | 0,50 ± 0,10 |
| CPF | 0,29 ± 0,03* | 0,14 ± 0,01* | 0,61 ± 0,04 |
| H | 1,26 ± 0,11 | 1,30 ± 0,20+ | 2,94 ± 0,37+ |
| HPF | 0,52 ± 0,03* | 0,03 ± 0,05* ° | 0,52 ± 0,03* |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 8).*p < 0.05 comparing C × CPF and H × HPF; +p < 0.05 comparing C × H; °p < 0.05 comparing CPF × HPF. Control Group (C); Control + Fermented Product Group (CPF); Hypercholesterolemic Diet Group (H); and Hypercholesterolemic + Fermented Product Group (HPF).
In vitro lipolysis rate (μmol of glycerol released/h.100 mg) in RET and EPI in rats fed different diets during 8 weeks.
| Groups | RET | EPI |
| C | 0,34 ± 0,02 | 0,36 ± 0,01 |
| CPF | 0,51 ± 0,14* | 0,29 ± 0,04 |
| H | 0,37 ± 0,02 | 0,39 ± 0,41 |
| HPF | 0,60 ± 0,003* | 0,61 ± 0,04* ° |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 8).*p < 0.05 comparing C × CPF and H × HPF; +p < 0.05 comparing C × H; °p < 0.05 comparing CPF × HPF. Control Group (C); Control + Fermented Product Group (CPF); Hypercholesterolemic Diet Group (H); and Hypercholesterolemic + Fermented Product Group (HPF).
Lipid parameters (Plasma Triglycerides, Total Cholesterol and HDL-Cholesterol Concentrations – mg/dl) in rats fed different diets during 8 weeks.
| Groups | Triglycerides | Cholesterol | HDL-cholesterol |
| C | 122.67 ± 15.08 | 62.17 ± 3.07 | 18.66 ± 1.76 |
| CPF | 157.29 ± 16.36 | 69.28 ± 2.61 | 27.14 ± 1.71* |
| H | 177.83 ± 15.78+ | 108.67 ± 5.22+ | 20.00 ± 1.26 |
| HPF | 94.83 ± 6.36* | 91.40 ± 2.13* ° | 22.33 ± 1.02 |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 8).*p < 0.05 comparing C × CPF and H × HPF; +p < 0.05 comparing C × H; °p < 0.05 comparing CPF × HPF. Control Group (C); Control + Fermented Product Group (CPF); Hypercholesterolemic Diet Group (H); and Hypercholesterolemic + Fermented Product Group (HPF).