Literature DB >> 19085489

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of periprosthetic biological reactions.

Guillaume Mabilleau1, Young-Min Kwon, Hemant Pandit, David W Murray, Afsie Sabokbar.   

Abstract

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty has undergone a recent resurgence as an alternative treatment option for young and active patients with significant osteoarthritis. The claimed advantages of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty include lower wear rate, preservation of bone stock for subsequent revision procedures, restoration of anatomic hip mechanics, and enhanced stability due to the larger diameter of articulation. A disadvantage, however, is that the metal-on-metal resurfacing releases large amounts of very small wear particles and metal ions. The long-term biological consequences of the exposure to these Co-Cr particles and ions remain largely unknown. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current literature on the adverse periprosthetic biological reactions associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19085489     DOI: 10.1080/17453670810016795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  34 in total

1.  High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Ronny Pilz; Urs Munzinger; Otmar Hersche; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cup loosening after cemented Metasul® total hip replacement: a retrieval analysis.

Authors:  Christophe Nich; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Perivascular lymphocytic infiltration is not limited to metal-on-metal bearings.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Michael D Skeels; Joanne B Adams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system-a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips.

Authors:  Thomas Baad-Hansen; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Joint replacement surgery and the innate immune system.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Yrjo T Konttinen; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2014

6.  Catastrophic failure due to aggressive metallosis 4 years after hip resurfacing in a woman in her forties--a case report.

Authors:  Thord von Schewelov; Lennart Sanzén
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips.

Authors:  Pat Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh; Scott Nelson; Karren Takamura; Koen De Smet; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01

9.  Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?

Authors:  Gabrielle S Donahue; Viktor Lindgren; Vincent P Galea; Rami Madanat; Orhun Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hip resurfacing: expectations and limitations.

Authors:  K De Smet; A Calistri
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.