Literature DB >> 19083926

Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: development of selection criteria and initial experience.

Ariel Gutstein1, Arik Wolak, Cynthia Lee, Damini Dey, Muneo Ohba, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Victor Cheng, Heidi Gransar, Shoji Suzuki, John Friedman, Louise E Thomson, Sean Hayes, Raymond Pimentel, William Paz, Piotr Slomka, Daniel S Berman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prospectively gated coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) with dual-source CT allows substantial reduction of radiation exposure but requires prospective single-phase selection and assessment of likelihood of adequate image quality.
OBJECTIVE: We developed and tested the model for predicting success of prospectively gated CCTA.
METHODS: Retrospectively gated CCTA was acquired with dual-source CT in 162 patients. Two cardiologists assessed by consensus whether diagnostic quality images could have been obtained in a single predefined phase, 70% of R-R interval (70P), thereby identifying patients in whom a prospectively gated scan at 70P would have been successful. Logistic regression models were built with and without a coronary calcium scan. The obtained criteria were applied on 42 additional patients.
RESULTS: By logistic regression, heart rate before CCTA of >or=70 beats/min, maximal heart rate variation before CCTA of >or=10 beats/min, coronary calcium score >or= 400 U, and body mass index (in kg/m(2)) >or= 30 were independent predictors of unsuccessful prospectively gated CCTA using 70P. Excluding coronary calcium score from the model, these same variables in addition to age > 65 years were found to be predictors of unsuccessful prospectively gated CCTA. Applying this model to 42 additional patients, using prospective gating, only 5 segments in 4 patients were nondiagnostic. Mean radiation dose for prospectively gated CCTA was 2.2 +/- 0.8 mSv.
CONCLUSION: Prospectively gated CCTA with dual-source CT can be successfully implemented with consideration of prescan heart rate, heart rate variability, body mass index, and coronary calcium score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19083926     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2007.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  15 in total

1.  Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Wm Guy Weigold; Gaby Weissman; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Dyspnea predicts mortality among patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Rine Nakanishi; Heidi Gransar; Alan Rozanski; Jamal S Rana; Victor Y Cheng; Louise E J Thomson; Romalisa Miranda-Peats; Damini Dey; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; James K Min; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Low-dose CT and cardiac MR for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: accuracy of single and combined approaches.

Authors:  Hans Scheffel; Paul Stolzmann; Hatem Alkadhi; Naim Azemaj; André Plass; Stephan Baumueller; Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; Sebastian Kozerke; Volkmar Falk; Peter Boesiger; Christophe Wyss; Borut Marincek; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  CT coronary angiography: 256-slice and 320-detector row scanners.

Authors:  Edward M Hsiao; Frank J Rybicki; Michael Steigner
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Comparison of radiation dose and image quality of triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography between conventional helical scanning and a strategy incorporating sequential scanning.

Authors:  Eric D Manheimer; M Robert Peters; Steven D Wolff; Mehreen A Qureshi; Prashanth Atluri; Gregory D N Pearson; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector Computed Tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Ambarish Gopal; Song S Mao; Daniel Karlsberg; Emily Young; Joshua Waggoner; Naser Ahmadi; Raveen S Pal; John Leal; Ronald P Karlsberg; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  New Imaging Protocols for New Single Photon Emission CT Technologies.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2010-04-20

8.  Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT anatomically guided by coregistered 64-slice coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Victor Y Cheng; Damini Dey; Jonghye Woo; Amit Ramesh; Serge Van Kriekinge; Yasuzuki Suzuki; Yaron Elad; Ronald Karlsberg; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomographic angiography between conventional helical scanning and a strategy incorporating sequential scanning.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Steven D Wolff; Eric D Manheimer; James Thompson; Sylvia Terry; Seth Uretsky; Adalbert Pilip; M Robert Peters
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography for stenosis detection according to calcium score: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martijn A M den Dekker; Kristof de Smet; Geertruida H de Bock; Rene A Tio; Matthijs Oudkerk; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.