Literature DB >> 19081812

Time-dependent mechanical characterization of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels using nanoindentation and unconfined compression.

Jessica D Kaufman1, Gregory J Miller, Elise F Morgan, Catherine M Klapperich.   

Abstract

Hydrogels pose unique challenges to nanoindentation including sample preparation, control of experimental parameters, and limitations imposed by mechanical testing instruments and data analysis originally intended for harder materials. The artifacts that occur during nanoindentation of hydrated samples have been described, but the material properties obtained from hydrated nanoindentation have not yet been related to the material properties obtained from macroscale testing. To evaluate the best method for correlating results from microscale and macroscale tests of soft materials, nanoindentation and unconfined compression stress-relaxation tests were performed on poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (pHEMA) hydrogels with a range of cross-linker concentrations. The nanoindentation data were analyzed with the Oliver-Pharr elastic model and the Maxwell-Wiechert (j = 2) viscoelastic model. The unconfined compression data were analyzed with the Maxwell-Wiechert model. This viscoelastic model provided an excellent fit for the stress-relaxation curves from both tests. The time constants from nanoindentation and unconfined compression were significantly different, and we propose that these differences are due to differences in equilibration time between the microscale and macroscale experiments and in sample geometry. The Maxwell-Wiechert equilibrium modulus provided the best agreement between nanoindentation and unconfined compression. Also, both nanoindentation analyses showed an increase in modulus with each increasing cross-linker concentration, validating that nanoindentation can discriminate between similar, low-modulus, hydrated samples.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19081812      PMCID: PMC2600455          DOI: 10.1557/JMR.2008.0185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Res        ISSN: 0884-1616            Impact factor:   3.089


  10 in total

1.  Stress relaxation of deformed gel in a good solvent.

Authors:  Shigeo Sasaki
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Nanoindentation of soft hydrated materials for application to vascular tissues.

Authors:  D M Ebenstein; L A Pruitt
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Oscillating adhesive contacts between micron-scale tips and compliant polymers.

Authors:  K J Wahl; S A S Asif; J A Greenwood; K L Johnson
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 8.128

4.  A comparison of JKR-based methods to analyze quasi-static and dynamic indentation force curves.

Authors:  Donna M Ebenstein; Kathryn J Wahl
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 8.128

5.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification.

Authors:  Adam J Engler; Shamik Sen; H Lee Sweeney; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Effect of indenter size on elastic modulus of cartilage measured by indentation.

Authors:  Narendra K Simha; Hui Jin; Mellanie L Hall; Sidharth Chiravarambath; Jack L Lewis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Compressive behavior of articular cartilage is not completely explained by proteoglycan osmotic pressure.

Authors:  P S Khalsa; S R Eisenberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The effect of dehydration history on PVA/PVP hydrogels for nucleus pulposus replacement.

Authors:  Jonathan Thomas; Kate Gomes; Anthony Lowman; Michele Marcolongo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--I. Theoretical analysis.

Authors:  A F Mak; W M Lai; V C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments.

Authors:  Adam J Engler; Maureen A Griffin; Shamik Sen; Carsten G Bönnemann; H Lee Sweeney; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 10.539

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Vascular smooth muscle cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength.

Authors:  Brett C Isenberg; Paul A Dimilla; Matthew Walker; Sooyoung Kim; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Quantification of magnetically induced changes in ECM local apparent stiffness.

Authors:  Sahan C B Herath; Du Yue; Shi Hui; Min-Cheol Kim; Dong-An Wang; Qingguo Wang; Krystyn J Van Vliet; Harry Asada; Peter C Y Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Combining AFM and acoustic probes to reveal changes in the elastic stiffness tensor of living cells.

Authors:  Nadja Nijenhuis; Xuegen Zhao; Alex Carisey; Christoph Ballestrem; Brian Derby
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Anisotropic stress orients remodelling of mammalian limb bud ectoderm.

Authors:  Kimberly Lau; Hirotaka Tao; Haijiao Liu; Jun Wen; Kendra Sturgeon; Natalie Sorfazlian; Savo Lazic; Jeffrey T A Burrows; Michael D Wong; Danyi Li; Steven Deimling; Brian Ciruna; Ian Scott; Craig Simmons; R Mark Henkelman; Trevor Williams; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis; Rodrigo Fernandez-Gonzalez; Yu Sun; Sevan Hopyan
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  A simple indentation device for measuring micrometer-scale tissue stiffness.

Authors:  I Levental; K R Levental; E A Klein; R Assoian; R T Miller; R G Wells; P A Janmey
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 2.333

6.  Use of microindentation to characterize the mechanical properties of articular cartilage: comparison of biphasic material properties across length scales.

Authors:  G J Miller; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Multi-modal characterization of polymeric gels to determine the influence of testing method on observed elastic modulus.

Authors:  David M Kingsley; Caitlin H McCleery; Christopher D L Johnson; Michael T K Bramson; Deniz Rende; Ryan J Gilbert; David T Corr
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-01-10

8.  Microstructure, local viscoelasticity and cell culture suitability of 3D hybrid HA/collagen scaffolds.

Authors:  Johanna Roether; Sarah Bertels; Claude Oelschlaeger; Martin Bastmeyer; Norbert Willenbacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Micro-Mechanical Viscoelastic Properties of Crosslinked Hydrogels Using the Nano-Epsilon Dot Method.

Authors:  Giorgio Mattei; Ludovica Cacopardo; Arti Ahluwalia
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Comparison of frequency and strain-rate domain mechanical characterization.

Authors:  Luca Bartolini; Davide Iannuzzi; Giorgio Mattei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.