Literature DB >> 30703738

Multi-modal characterization of polymeric gels to determine the influence of testing method on observed elastic modulus.

David M Kingsley1, Caitlin H McCleery2, Christopher D L Johnson3, Michael T K Bramson4, Deniz Rende5, Ryan J Gilbert6, David T Corr7.   

Abstract

Demand for materials that mechanically replicate native tissue has driven development and characterization of various new biomaterials. However, a consequence of materials and characterization technique diversity is a lack of consensus within the field, with no clear way to compare values measured via different modalities. This likely contributes to the difficulty in replicating findings across the research community; recent evidence suggests that different modalities do not yield the same mechanical measurements within a material, and direct comparisons cannot be made across different testing platforms. Herein, we examine whether "material properties" are characterization modality-specific by analyzing the elastic moduli determined by five typical biomaterial mechanical characterization techniques: unconfined-compression, tensiometry, rheometry, and micro-indentation at the macroscopic level, and microscopically using nanoindentation. These analyses were performed in two different polymeric gels frequently used for biological applications, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and agarose. Each was fabricated to span a range of moduli, from physiologic to supraphysiologic values. All five techniques identified the same overall trend within each material group, supporting their ability to appreciate relative moduli differences. However, significant differences were found across modalities, illustrating a difference in absolute moduli values, and thereby precluding direct comparison of measurements from different characterization modalities. These observed differences may depend on material compliance, viscoelasticity, and microstructure. While determining the underlying mechanism(s) of these differences was beyond the scope of this work, these results demonstrate how each modality affects the measured moduli of the same material, and the sensitivity of each modality to changes in sample material composition.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30703738      PMCID: PMC6387847          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  39 in total

1.  New insight into agarose gel mechanical properties.

Authors:  V Normand; D L Lootens; E Amici; K P Plucknett; P Aymard
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Polymeric systems for controlled drug release.

Authors:  K E Uhrich; S M Cannizzaro; R S Langer; K M Shakesheff
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Analysis of a femoral hip prosthesis designed to reduce stress shielding.

Authors:  M G Joshi; S G Advani; F Miller; M H Santare
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Protein release from alginate matrices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  1998-05-04       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Nanoindentation of soft hydrated materials for application to vascular tissues.

Authors:  D M Ebenstein; L A Pruitt
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  E J Cheal; M Spector; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques.

Authors:  C H Turner; J Rho; Y Takano; T Y Tsui; G M Pharr
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Compatibility of mammalian cells on surfaces of poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  Jessamine Ng Lee; Xingyu Jiang; Declan Ryan; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Evaluation of polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds with physiologically-relevant elastic moduli: interplay of substrate mechanics and surface chemistry effects on vascular smooth muscle cell response.

Authors:  Xin Q Brown; Keiko Ookawa; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Design characteristics for the tissue engineering of cartilaginous tissues.

Authors:  Alejandro J Almarza; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mechanical Characterization of Synthetic Gels for Creation of Surrogate Hands Subjected to Low-Velocity Impacts.

Authors:  Eduardo M Sosa; Marta M Moure
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-09-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.