Literature DB >> 19720019

Vascular smooth muscle cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength.

Brett C Isenberg1, Paul A Dimilla, Matthew Walker, Sooyoung Kim, Joyce Y Wong.   

Abstract

Mechanical compliance is emerging as an important environmental cue that can influence certain cell behaviors, such as morphology and motility. Recent in vitro studies have shown that cells preferentially migrate from less stiff to more stiff substrates; however, much of this phenomenon, termed durotaxis, remains ill-defined. To address this problem, we studied the morphology and motility of vascular smooth muscle cells on well-defined stiffness gradients. Baselines for cell spreading, polarization, and random motility on uniform gels with moduli ranging from 5 to 80 kPa were found to increase with increasing stiffness. Subsequent analysis of the behavior of vascular smooth muscle cells on gradient substrata (0-4 kPa/100 mum, with absolute moduli of 1-80 kPa) demonstrated that the morphology on gradient gels correlated with the absolute modulus. In contrast, durotaxis (evaluated quantitatively as the tactic index for a biased persistent random walk) and cell orientation with respect to the gradient both increased with increasing magnitude of gradient, but were independent of the absolute modulus. These observations provide a foundation for establishing quantitative relationships between gradients in substrate stiffness and cell response. Moreover, these results reveal common features of phenomenological cell response to chemotactic and durotactic gradients, motivating further mechanistic studies of how cells integrate and respond to multiple complex signals.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19720019      PMCID: PMC2749749          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  36 in total

1.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate.

Authors:  C M Lo; H B Wang; M Dembo; Y L Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Chemotaxis in leukocytes.

Authors:  M McCUTCHEON
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1946-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Durotaxis as an elastic stability phenomenon.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Lazopoulos; Dimitrije Stamenović
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Quantitative relationships between single-cell and cell-population model parameters for chemosensory migration responses of alveolar macrophages to C5a.

Authors:  B E Farrell; R P Daniele; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  1990

5.  Models of dispersal in biological systems.

Authors:  H G Othmer; S R Dunbar; W Alt
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Matrix strains induced by cells: Computing how far cells can feel.

Authors:  Shamik Sen; Adam J Engler; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.321

7.  Covalently immobilized gradients of bFGF on hydrogel scaffolds for directed cell migration.

Authors:  Solitaire A DeLong; James J Moon; Jennifer L West
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Periodic lamellipodial contractions correlate with rearward actin waves.

Authors:  Grégory Giannone; Benjamin J Dubin-Thaler; Hans-Günther Döbereiner; Nelly Kieffer; Anne R Bresnick; Michael P Sheetz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance.

Authors:  Mark F Berry; Adam J Engler; Y Joseph Woo; Timothy J Pirolli; Lawrence T Bish; Vasant Jayasankar; Kevin J Morine; Timothy J Gardner; Dennis E Discher; H Lee Sweeney
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  A stochastic model for leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis based on receptor binding fluctuations.

Authors:  R T Tranquillo; D A Lauffenburger; S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  138 in total

Review 1.  Physico-mechanical aspects of extracellular matrix influences on tumorigenic behaviors.

Authors:  Edna Cukierman; Daniel E Bassi
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 15.707

2.  Topographic modulation of the orientation and shape of cell nuclei and their influence on the measured elastic modulus of epithelial cells.

Authors:  Clayton T McKee; Vijay K Raghunathan; Paul F Nealey; Paul Russell; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Mapping three-dimensional stress and strain fields within a soft hydrogel using a fluorescence microscope.

Authors:  Matthew S Hall; Rong Long; Chung-Yuen Hui; Mingming Wu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Microfabricated substrates as a tool to study cell mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Jimmy le Digabel; Marion Ghibaudo; Léa Trichet; Alain Richert; Benoit Ladoux
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Surface creasing instability of soft polyacrylamide cell culture substrates.

Authors:  Krishanu Saha; Jungwook Kim; Elizabeth Irwin; Jinhwan Yoon; Farhana Momin; Verónica Trujillo; David V Schaffer; Kevin E Healy; Ryan C Hayward
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Synergistic regulation of cell function by matrix rigidity and adhesive pattern.

Authors:  Shinuo Weng; Jianping Fu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Effect of substrate stiffness and PDGF on the behavior of vascular smooth muscle cells: implications for atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Xin Q Brown; Erzsebet Bartolak-Suki; Corin Williams; Mathew L Walker; Valerie M Weaver; Joyce Y Wong
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Substrates with patterned extracellular matrix and subcellular stiffness gradients reveal local biomechanical responses.

Authors:  Peter Tseng; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 30.849

9.  Effects of Increased Arterial Stiffness on Atherosclerotic Plaque Amounts.

Authors:  Kellie V Stoka; Justine A Maedeker; Lisa Bennett; Siddharth A Bhayani; William S Gardner; Jesse D Procknow; Austin J Cocciolone; Tezin A Walji; Clarissa S Craft; Jessica E Wagenseil
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Tuning three-dimensional collagen matrix stiffness independently of collagen concentration modulates endothelial cell behavior.

Authors:  Brooke N Mason; Alina Starchenko; Rebecca M Williams; Lawrence J Bonassar; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.