Literature DB >> 1907769

A prospective trial comparing Biobrane, Duoderm and xeroform for skin graft donor sites.

D L Feldman1, A Rogers, R H Karpinski.   

Abstract

Many new dressings have been introduced for use on split-thickness skin graft donor sites in an effort to reduce pain at the donor site and decrease healing time, while maintaining a low infection rate and cost. To assess these factors in two such dressings, Biobrane (temporary wound dressing) (Winthrop) and Duoderm (hydrocolloid dressing) (Convatec), we compared them with a conventional fine mesh gauze dressing, xeroform, in a prospective, randomized study of 30 donor sites in the same number of patients. Wounds were considered healed when they were 100 per cent re-epithelialized and required no further dressings. Patient self-assessment of pain was quantified on a scale of zero to ten, with ten being the most severe pain. Donor sites dressed with xeroform had a healing time of 10.5 days, which was significantly better (p less than 0.05) than Duoderm (15.3 days) or Biobrane (19.0 days), although the protocol for Duoderm use (wound visualization at seven day intervals) extended the apparent healing times in this group. Duoderm was the most comfortable dressing (0.53 grade) when compared with Biobrane (1.44) and xeroform (2.41, p less than 0.05). No infections occurred in donor sites dressed with xeroform, but two developed in patients using Biobrane. One patient with a Duoderm dressing had a donor site infection during a drug-related neutropenic reaction. Xeroform was the least expensive dressing to use ($1.16 per patient), followed by Duoderm ($54.88 per patient) and Biobrane ($102.57 per patient). The results of our study confirm the usefulness of xeroform as a donor site dressing as it promotes relatively rapid healing, is easy to use and is inexpensive. We found Duoderm to be ideal for smaller donor sites when pain could be significantly reduced with minimal increase in cost. Biobrane is too costly and the infection rate too high for it to be used routinely as a skin graft donor site dressing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1907769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  16 in total

1.  Making the V-Y advancement flap safer in fingertip amputations.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Larisa Kristine Vartija
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Hydrocolloid dressings in the management of acute wounds: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Stephen Thomas
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Biobrane dressing for paediatric burns in Singapore: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Cong Fan; Chong Han Pek; Yong Chen Por; Gale Jue Shuang Lim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Hydrogel-based dressings in the treatment of partial thickness experimentally induced burn wounds in rats.

Authors:  Milton Junior Cândido Bernardes; Randys Caldeira Gonçalves; Carolyna de Sousa Carvalho; Luciana Martins Rosa; Amanda Peixoto Ferreira; Marielle Sousa Vilela; Marina Clare Vinaud; Hélio Galdino Junior; Ruy de Souza Lino Junior
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.564

5.  A Clinical Study Comparing Helicoll with Scarlet Red and OpSite in the Treatment of Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Prema Dhanraj
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Back Grafting the Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site.

Authors:  Jeremy Goverman; Casey T Kraft; Shawn Fagan; Benjamin Levi
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

7.  Dermal matrices and bioengineered skin substitutes: a critical review of current options.

Authors:  Heidi Debels; Moustapha Hamdi; Keren Abberton; Wayne Morrison
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-02-06

8.  Comparison of three different methods of dressing for partial thickness skin graft donor site.

Authors:  Seyed Esmail Hassanpour; Seyed Mehdi Moosavizadeh; Masoud Yavari; Hamid Reza Hallaj Mofrad; Alireza Fadaei
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01

9.  Evaluation of Six Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor-site Dressing Materials in a Swine Model.

Authors:  Pamela C Masella; Eric M Balent; Terri L Carlson; Karen W Lee; Lisa M Pierce
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-01-06

Review 10.  Wound Healing: Biologics, Skin Substitutes, Biomembranes and Scaffolds.

Authors:  Krishna S Vyas; Henry C Vasconez
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.