Literature DB >> 26730031

A Clinical Study Comparing Helicoll with Scarlet Red and OpSite in the Treatment of Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Prema Dhanraj1.   

Abstract

Split thickness skin graft (STSG) is a key method in the reconstructive ladder for covering skin defects used widely by surgeons from all specialties. The donor site is often a source of delayed healing, associated with considerable pain and discomfort even more than the recipient wound. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to compare Helicoll® (EnColl Corp., Fremont, CA, USA), a type I pure collagen dressing, to OpSite® (Smith & Nephew, USA) dressing and to Scarlet Red® (Kendall HealthCare, USA) dressing in the treatment of standardized STSG donor sites. Thirty patients, over a 3-month period, underwent various reconstructive procedures, necessitating the use of STSGs. Following a simple randomized clinical protocol, the analysis of data included donor site pain, healing time of the donor site, initial absorption of the applied dressing and rate of infection with the three different dressings to form the basis of this paper. Patients in the Helicoll group reported significantly less pain, less infection rate and required no dressing change when compared with the OpSite (Johnson & Johnson, Langhorne, PA, USA) or the Scarlet Red groups. Healing time of the donor site in the Helicoll group was shorter than that in the Scarlet Red group; however, it was comparable to the OpSite group. This study indicates that Helicoll, as a donor site dressing, is successful in providing pain-free mobility with a measurable healing rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Donor site; Helicoll; OpSite; Scarlet Red; Split thickness skin graft (STSG)

Year:  2013        PMID: 26730031      PMCID: PMC4692922          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-013-0850-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of the effect of a collagen dressing and a polyurethane dressing on the healing of split thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites.

Authors:  R E Horch; G B Stark
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  1998-12

2.  Comparison of calcium sodium alginate (KALTOSTAT) and porcine xenograft (E-Z DERM) in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites.

Authors:  P Vanstraelen
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 3.  Moist wound healing.

Authors:  H Chang; S Wind; M D Kerstein
Journal:  Dermatol Nurs       Date:  1996-06

4.  Use of a semipermeable polyurethane membrane as a dressing for split-skin graft donor sites.

Authors:  M I Dinner; C R Peters; J Sherer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Care of the split-thickness skin graft donor site.

Authors:  G D Friedman; A Capozzi; V R Pennisi
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1974-02

6.  Biological dressings for skin graft donor sites.

Authors:  R E Salisbury; D W Wilmore; P Silverstein; B A Pruitt
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-05

7.  Comparison of donor site dressings.

Authors:  S C Brady; C F Snelling; G Chow
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Comparison of Biobrane and Scarlet Red dressings for treatment of donor site wounds.

Authors:  R Zapata-Sirvent; J F Hansbrough; W Carroll; R Johnson; A Wakimoto
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1985-06

9.  Comparing DuoDERM E with scarlet red in the treatment of split skin graft donor sites.

Authors:  S T Tan; R H Roberts; G B Blake
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1993-01

Review 10.  Nursing management of skin grafts and donor sites.

Authors:  T Young; A Fowler
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  1998 Mar 26-Apr 8
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing wound healing dressing development through interdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors:  Briauna Hawthorne; J Kai Simmons; Braden Stuart; Robert Tung; David S Zamierowski; Adam J Mellott
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.368

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.