Literature DB >> 19073758

Random capillary blood glucose cut points for diabetes and pre-diabetes derived from community-based opportunistic screening in India.

Suresh Somannavar1, Anbazhagan Ganesan, Mohan Deepa, Manjula Datta, Viswanathan Mohan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine random capillary blood glucose (RCBG) cut points that discriminate diabetic and pre-diabetic subjects from normal individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: RCBG was performed in 1,333 individuals randomly chosen from 63,305 individuals who had participated in an opportunistic screening program. An oral glucose tolerance test was also performed by venous plasma glucose on an autoanalyzer. RCBG cut points that discriminate diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: Using 2-h plasma glucose >or=200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) criterion, the RCBG cut point of 140 mg/dl (7.7 mmol/l) gave the highest sensitivity and specificity. For 2-h plasma glucose >or=200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >or=126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l) criteria, either 2-h plasma glucose >or=200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) or FPG >or=126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l) criterion, and the FPG >or=126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l) criterion, RCBG cut point was 143 mg/dl (7.9 mmol/l). RCBG cut points for IGT, IFG according to World Health Organization criterion, and IFG according to American Diabetes Association criterion were 119 mg/dl (6.6 mmol/l), 118 mg/dl (6.6 mmol/l), and 113 mg/dl (6.3 mmol/l), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Asian Indians with RCBG >110 mg/dl at screening can be recommended to undergo definitive testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19073758      PMCID: PMC2660445          DOI: 10.2337/dc08-0403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


Approximately 50–70% of people with diabetes remain undiagnosed in both developed (1) and developing countries (2), and these individuals often present with diabetes complications (3). It is established that good control of diabetes can prevent complications. Undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes therefore need to be detected and treated early through community-based screening (4). Definitions of diabetes are usually based on fasting or postprandial glucose. However, random capillary blood glucose (RCBG) is the most convenient way to reach large numbers of people. A few studies in Western countries (5,6) have tried to correlate RCBG with 2-h plasma glucose or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (the basis for the World Health Organization [WHO] and American Diabetes Association [ADA] definitions) but none from India, which has the largest number of people with diabetes globally (7). There are also no data on RCBG cut points for pre-diabetes states such as impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). This is particularly relevant because IFG now has two definitions: ≥100 mg/dl (5.6 mmol/l) according to ADA (8) and ≥110 mg/dl (6.1 mmol/l) according to WHO (9). The aim of this study, carried out in a community setting in southern India, was to derive RCBG cut points that discriminate diabetic from nondiabetic and pre-diabetic from non–pre-diabetic individuals.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Between September 2004 and September 2007, 774 opportunistic diabetes screening camps evaluating 103,878 people were conducted in various parts of Chennai (formerly Madras), India, with a population of 5 million in southern India, as part of the Prevention Awareness Counselling and Evaluation (PACE) Diabetes Project. Of these, 76,645 (73.8%) individuals underwent an RCBG test using One Touch Ultra (Lifescan, Johnson & Johnson, Milpitas, CA). The detailed methodology of this project is described elsewhere (10). Individuals with self-reported diabetes (n = 13,340) were excluded. Of the remaining 63,305 subjects, 1,500 individuals were randomly selected and invited to attend Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, a tertiary referral center for diabetes care, to undergo an oral glucose tolerance test within the next 2 to 3 days. A total of 1,333 individuals responded to the invitation (88.9% response rate). A sample was drawn for FPG estimation, 75 g of oral glucose was given, and a second sample was drawn at 120 min (2-h plasma glucose).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for PC Windows, version 10.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted using sensitivity and 1-specificity for different cutoff values of RCBG. Using the receiver operating characteristic technique, comparison of sensitivity with specificity was made over the entire range of RCBG cut points, and areas under the curve were plotted. By interpolation from the area under the curve, the point closest to the upper-left corner, which maximized sensitivity and specificity, was selected; this identified the highest number of subjects with or without a diabetes condition (11). In this manner, RCBG cut points were determined for diabetes, IGT, and IFG using ADA (8) and WHO (9) criteria (supplemental Figure 1A, available in an online appendix at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dc08-0403/DC1).

RESULTS

For the study group, mean ± SD age was 45.5 ± 10.7 years, BMI was 24.8 ± 4.0 kg/m2, and 45.2% were men. Additionally, 27.2% (n = 363) had RCBG <100 mg/dl (5.6 mmol/l), 65.9% (n = 878) had RCBG in the range of 100–200 mg/dl (5.6–11.1 mmol/l), and 6.9% (n = 92) had RCBG >200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l). Using the 2-h plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) criterion, the RCBG cut point of 140 mg/dl (7.7 mmol/l) gave the highest sensitivity and specificity (Table 1). Using the 2-h plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) and FPG ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l) criteria, either 2-h plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) or FPG ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l) criterion, or for FPG ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l) criterion, the RCBG cut point was 143 mg/dl (7.9 mmol/l).
Table 1

RCBG cut points with respect to diabetes, IGT, and IFG in Asian Indians

n (%)RCBG (mg/dl)RCBG cut pointsSensitivitySpecificityPPVAUCOverall accuracy (%)
Diabetes
    2-h PG ≥200 mg/dl or FPG ≥126 mg/dl238 (17.9)187.3 ± 67.014378.683.951.50.87282.9
    2-h PG ≥200 mg/dl185 (13.9)198.6 ± 69.114086.580.742.00.90081.5
    FPG ≥126 mg/dl194 (14.6)193.3 ± 70.214380.481.742.90.87381.5
    2-h PG ≥200 mg/dl and FPG ≥126 mg/dl141 (10.6)210.5 ± 71.814389.480.234.80.91981.2
IGT
    2-h PG ≥140 mg/dl and <200 mg/dl375 (28.1)168.4 ± 62.611964.765.527.20.71565.4
IFG (WHO)
    FPG ≥110 mg/dl and <126 mg/dl385 (28.9)165.0 ± 63.111862.862.925.40.68362.9
IFG (ADA)
    FPG ≥100 mg/dl and <126 mg/dl633 (47.5)146.9 ± 57.111358.358.646.90.61958.5
Abnormal glucose tolerance
    IGT and diabetes220 (16.5)191.8 ± 67.114182.382.448.00.88882.4
Abnormal glucose regulation
    IFG (WHO) or IGT or diabetes497 (37.3)157.5 ± 59.312170.269.958.10.77770.0
    IFG (ADA) or IGT or diabetes698 (52.4)145.4 ± 55.511666.565.568.00.71466.0

Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated. AUC, area under the curve; PG, plasma glucose; PPV, positive predictive value.

RCBG cut points with respect to diabetes, IGT, and IFG in Asian Indians Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated. AUC, area under the curve; PG, plasma glucose; PPV, positive predictive value. For IGT, the RCBG cut point was 119 mg/dl (6.6 mmol/l). Using the IFG (WHO) criterion of FPG ≥110 (6.1 mmol/l) and <126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l), the RCBG cut point was 118 mg/dl (6.6 mmol/l), while for the IFG (ADA) criterion of FPG ≥100 mg/dl (5.6 mmol/l) and <126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l), the RCBG cut point was 113 mg/dl (6.3 mmol/l).

CONCLUSIONS

The most commonly used tests for screening for type 2 diabetes are FPG and 2-h plasma glucose (9,10). Measurement of RCBG has an advantage in that it can be undertaken at any time of the day, does not require a venipuncture, and can even be performed by laypeople. In studies from North America, RCBG cut points ranging from 99 to 140 mg/dl have been reported to identify diabetes (5,12–14). Our study presents the first such data from India and shows that, in Asian Indians, RCBG cut points of 140 and 143 mg/dl (7.8 and 7.9 mmol/l) maximized the sensitivity and specificity for diabetes. Moreover, this study provides the first data, to our knowledge, on RCPG cut points for IGT (119 mg/dl [6.6 mmol/l]), two definitions of IFG (WHO 118 mg/dl and ADA 113 mg/dl), and abnormal glucose tolerance (141 mg/dl) and regulation (121 mg/dl). The strengths of this study are that it is based on a large number of subjects, was performed in a “real life” community-based setting, and is the first, to our knowledge, to report on cut points for IGT and IFG according to WHO and ADA criteria. Based on the findings of our study, we propose that in opportunistic screening studies in Asian Indians, all those with RCBG values >110 mg/dl (6.1 mmol/l) should receive more definitive tests for diabetes and pre-diabetes. This could not only help limit the number of individuals who must arrive for screening in a fasting state but also reduce the costs of screening, as only 60% of those screened would have RCBG >110 mg/dl.
  12 in total

1.  Screening for type 2 diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Saul Genuth; K G M M Alberti; Peter Bennett; John Buse; Ralph Defronzo; Richard Kahn; John Kitzmiller; William C Knowler; Harold Lebovitz; Ake Lernmark; David Nathan; Jerry Palmer; Robert Rizza; Christopher Saudek; Jonathan Shaw; Michael Steffes; Michael Stern; Jaako Tuomilehto; Paul Zimmet
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Efficient cutoff points for three screening tests for detecting undiagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Michael M Engelgau; Rodolfo Valdez; Betsy Cadwell; Stephanie M Benjamin; K M Venkat Narayan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Undiagnosed NIDDM: clinical and public health issues.

Authors:  M I Harris
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diabetes Screening in Canada (DIASCAN) Study: prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes and glucose intolerance in family physician offices.

Authors:  L A Leiter; A Barr; A Bélanger; S Lubin; S A Ross; H D Tildesley; N Fontaine
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Performance of recommended screening tests for undiagnosed diabetes and dysglycemia.

Authors:  D B Rolka; K M Narayan; T J Thompson; D Goldman; J Lindenmayer; K Alich; D Bacall; E M Benjamin; B Lamb; D O Stuart; M M Engelgau
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Prevention awareness counselling and evaluation (PACE) diabetes project: a mega multi-pronged program for diabetes awareness and prevention in South India (PACE- 5).

Authors:  S Somannavar; H Lanthorn; R Pradeepa; V Narayanan; M Rema; V Mohan
Journal:  J Assoc Physicians India       Date:  2008-06

9.  A model for early diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary health care.

Authors:  D K Andersson; E Lundblad; K Svärdsudd
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  Screening for diabetes mellitus in adults. The utility of random capillary blood glucose measurements.

Authors:  M M Engelgau; T J Thompson; P J Smith; W H Herman; R E Aubert; E W Gunter; S F Wetterhall; E S Sous; M A Ali
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Associations between structural and functional changes to the kidney in diabetic humans and mice.

Authors:  David W Powell; David N Kenagy; Shirong Zheng; Susan C Coventry; Jianxiang Xu; Lu Cai; Edward C Carlson; Paul N Epstein
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 5.037

2.  Changes in Screening Practices for Prediabetes and Diabetes Since the Recommendation for Hemoglobin A1c Testing.

Authors:  Joshua M Evron; William H Herman; Laura N McEwen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  A study on the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in coastal Karnataka.

Authors:  Chythra R Rao; Veena G Kamath; Avinash Shetty; Asha Kamath
Journal:  Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries       Date:  2010-04

4.  Elevated blood glucose is associated with aggravated brain edema in acute stroke.

Authors:  Gabriel Broocks; Andre Kemmling; Jens Aberle; Helge Kniep; Matthias Bechstein; Fabian Flottmann; Hannes Leischner; Tobias D Faizy; Jawed Nawabi; Gerhard Schön; Peter Sporns; Götz Thomalla; Jens Fiehler; Uta Hanning
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Developing a Screening Algorithm for Type II Diabetes Mellitus in the Resource-Limited Setting of Rural Tanzania.

Authors:  Caroline West; David Ploth; Virginia Fonner; Jessie Mbwambo; Francis Fredrick; Michael Sweat
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.378

6.  Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus and Exposure to Suspended Particulate Matter.

Authors:  Anu Maria Jacob; Manjula Datta; Satyavani Kumpatla; Pradeep Selvaraj; Vijay Viswanthan
Journal:  J Health Pollut       Date:  2019-05-22

7.  ADA Diabetes Risk Test Adaptation in Indonesian Adult Populations: Can It Replace Random Blood Glucose Screening Test?

Authors:  Dante S Harbuwono; Muhammad Ikhsan Mokoagow; Nadya Magfira; Helda Helda
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

8.  Prevalence and risk factors for vitamin C deficiency in north and south India: a two centre population based study in people aged 60 years and over.

Authors:  Ravilla D Ravindran; Praveen Vashist; Sanjeev K Gupta; Ian S Young; Giovanni Maraini; Monica Camparini; R Jayanthi; Neena John; Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Usha Chakravarthy; Thulasiraj D Ravilla; Astrid E Fletcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Opportunistic Screening for Hypertension and Selected Cardiovascular Risk Factors among Adults Attending a Primary Health Center in Puducherry, India.

Authors:  Anindo Majumdar; Palanivel Chinnakali; V Vinayagamoorthy; Praveena A Daya; Umakant G Shidam; Gautam Roy
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-12

10.  Screening for diabetes in high risk a passé.

Authors:  Sandeep Julka; Raksha Goyal; Rituraj Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.