Literature DB >> 7497854

Screening for diabetes mellitus in adults. The utility of random capillary blood glucose measurements.

M M Engelgau1, T J Thompson, P J Smith, W H Herman, R E Aubert, E W Gunter, S F Wetterhall, E S Sous, M A Ali.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Because half of the people with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) are undiagnosed and because near-normal glycemic control can prevent diabetic complications, we evaluated the use of field-based random capillary blood glucose measurement as a screening test for NIDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of 828 Egyptians > or = 20 years of age underwent both a random capillary blood glucose measurement performed with a portable reflectance meter in the field and an oral glucose tolerance test in the laboratory. The sensitivity and specificity of random capillary blood glucose measurements in predicting the presence of NIDDM were evaluated.
RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed that the screening test performed better when subjects had eaten shortly before the test (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.87 for a 1-h postprandial period compared with 0.69 for an 8-h postprandial period) and that the optimal capillary blood glucose cutoff points to define a positive test increased with age. For a postprandial period of 1 h, cutoff points of 115 mg/dl for individuals 30 years of age and 140 mg/dl for those 75 years of age yielded similar performance characteristics (sensitivity 82% and specificity 78% for those 30 years old; sensitivity 81% and specificity 80% for those 75 years old).
CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting random capillary blood glucose measurements for the postprandial period and using age-specific cutoff point values can improve performance of the screening test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7497854     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.18.4.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  15 in total

1.  Strategies to identify adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Implementing a diabetes prevention program in a rural African-American church.

Authors:  Y Monique Davis-Smith; Monique Davis-Smith; John Mark Boltri; J Paul Seale; Sylvia Shellenberger; Travis Blalock; Brian Tobin
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Food for Life / Comida para la Vida: creating a food festival to raise diabetes awareness.

Authors:  Kristie Lancaster; Willie Walker; Thomas Vance; Phyllis Kaskel; Guedy Arniella; Carol Horowitz
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2009

4.  Random plasma glucose in serendipitous screening for glucose intolerance: screening for impaired glucose tolerance study 2.

Authors:  David C Ziemer; Paul Kolm; Jovonne K Foster; William S Weintraub; Viola Vaccarino; Mary K Rhee; Rincy M Varughese; Circe W Tsui; David D Koch; Jennifer G Twombly; K M Venkat Narayan; Lawrence S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Screening for diabetes in an African-American community: the Project DIRECT experience.

Authors:  Deborah S Porterfield; Rebecca Din; Angela Burroughs; Barri Burrus; Regina Petteway; Linda Treiber; Betty Lamb; Michael Engelgau
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  The Intra- or Extracellular Redox State Was Not Affected by a High vs. Low Glycemic Response Diet in Mice.

Authors:  Amber S Kleckner; Siu Wong; Barbara E Corkey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Detecting Dysglycemia Using the 2015 United States Preventive Services Task Force Screening Criteria: A Cohort Analysis of Community Health Center Patients.

Authors:  Matthew J O'Brien; Ji Young Lee; Mercedes R Carnethon; Ronald T Ackermann; Maria C Vargas; Andrew Hamilton; Nivedita Mohanty; Sarah S Rittner; Jessica N Park; Amro Hassan; David R Buchanan; Lei Liu; Joseph Feinglass
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Comparison of Point-of-Care Testing and Hospital-Based Methods in Screening for Potential Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Abnormal Glucose Regulation in a Dental Setting.

Authors:  Muneedej Suwattipong; Thitima Thuramonwong; Chanita Tantipoj; Pornpoj Fuangtharnthip; Supanee Thanakun; Weerapan Khovidhunkit; Siribang-On Piboonniyom Khovidhunkit
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Random capillary blood glucose cut points for diabetes and pre-diabetes derived from community-based opportunistic screening in India.

Authors:  Suresh Somannavar; Anbazhagan Ganesan; Mohan Deepa; Manjula Datta; Viswanathan Mohan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Diagnostic labelling influences self-rated health. A prospective cohort study: the HUNT Study, Norway.

Authors:  Pål Jørgensen; Arnulf Langhammer; Steinar Krokstad; Siri Forsmo
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.