Literature DB >> 19070221

Equivalent phantom sizes and shapes for brachytherapy dosimetric studies of 192Ir and 137Cs.

Domingo Granero1, Jose Perez-Calatayud, M Carmen Pujades-Claumarchirant, Facundo Ballester, Christopher S Melhus, Mark J Rivard.   

Abstract

The impact of phantom size and shape in brachytherapy dosimetry was assessed using Monte Carlo methods in liquid water for 192Ir and 137Cs point sources. This is needed since differences in published dosimetry data, both measurements and simulations, employ a variety of phantom sizes and shapes which can cause dose differences exceeding 30% near the phantom periphery. Spheres of radius, Rsph, 10-40 cm were examined to determine the equivalent spherical phantom size to a variety of cylinder and cube sizes, Rcyl and Rcube, respectively. These sizes ranged from 10 to 30 cm. The equivalent Rsph for a given size cylinder or cube was determined using a figure of merit (FOM) function to minimize differences between radial dose functions, g(r). Using the FOM approach, a linear fit (R2 > 0.99) was obtained for the equivalent Rsph for a given size cylinder or cube. The equivalent phantom for a cylinder, of 40 cm diameter and length 40 cm, is a sphere of 21 cm in radius and the equivalent phantom for a cube of 30 cm on each side is a sphere of 17.5 in radius. When normalizing all results to r=1 cm for g(r) comparisons of phantom shape, the absolute dose rates were equivalent within 0.1% for Rsph > or =10 cm for both 192Ir and 137Cs. Correlation factors to permit comparisons of unbounded g(r) data for r < or =15 cm in 20 published datasets resulted in agreement generally within 2%. Residual differences with four datasets were attributed to methodological uncertainties in the published references.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19070221     DOI: 10.1118/1.2982140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Dosimetric characterization of round HDR 192Ir accuboost applicators for breast brachytherapy.

Authors:  Mark J Rivard; Christopher S Melhus; David E Wazer; Raymond J Bricault
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Treatment planning of a skin-sparing conical breast brachytherapy applicator using conventional brachytherapy software.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Christopher S Melhus; Shirin Sioshansi; Mark J Rivard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparison of organ doses for patients undergoing balloon brachytherapy of the breast with HDR 192Ir or electronic sources using monte carlo simulations in a heterogeneous human phantom.

Authors:  Matthew M Mille; X George Xu; Mark J Rivard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Monte Carlo-based investigation of water-equivalence of solid phantoms at (137)Cs energy.

Authors:  Ramkrushna S Vishwakarma; T Palani Selvam; Sridhar Sahoo; Subhalaxmi Mishra; Ghanshyam Chourasiya
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-10

5.  Film based verification of calculation algorithms used for brachytherapy planning-getting ready for upcoming challenges of MBDCA.

Authors:  Grzegorz Zwierzchowski; Grzegorz Bielęda; Janusz Skowronek; Magdalena Mazur
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-08-16

6.  Perturbation of TG-43 parameters of the brachytherapy sources under insufficient scattering materials.

Authors:  Mehdi Zehtabian; Sedigheh Sina; Reza Faghihi; Ali Meigooni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Monte Carlo dosimetric study of the Flexisource Co-60 high dose rate source.

Authors:  Javier Vijande; Domingo Granero; Jose Perez-Calatayud; Facundo Ballester
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-03-30

8.  Physics-aspects of dose accuracy in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy: source dosimetry, treatment planning, equipment performance and in vivo verification techniques.

Authors:  Antony Palmer; David Bradley; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-30

Review 9.  Review of clinical brachytherapy uncertainties: analysis guidelines of GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM.

Authors:  Christian Kirisits; Mark J Rivard; Dimos Baltas; Facundo Ballester; Marisol De Brabandere; Rob van der Laarse; Yury Niatsetski; Panagiotis Papagiannis; Taran Paulsen Hellebust; Jose Perez-Calatayud; Kari Tanderup; Jack L M Venselaar; Frank-André Siebert
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Dosimetry of indigenously developed (192)Ir high-dose rate brachytherapy source: An EGSnrc Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Sridhar Sahoo; T Palani Selvam; S D Sharma; Trupti Das; A C Dey; B N Patil; K V S Sastri
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.