Literature DB >> 19068264

Calculation of passive sampling rates from both native PCBs and depuration compounds in indoor and outdoor environments.

Carolyn Persoon1, Keri C Hornbuckle.   

Abstract

Passive sampling has become a practical way of sampling persistent organic pollutants over large spatial and remote areas; however, its ease in use is also coupled with some uncertainty in calculating air concentrations from accumulated mass. Here we report a comparison study of polyurethane-foam-based passive samplers (PUF-PAS) for quantitatively determining the sampling rates of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from air. We measured both uptake of native PCBs and loss of depuration compounds and determined the sampling rates (R-values) for multiple samplers harvested at three different time periods. The uptake of native PCBs in the linear phase was similar to the loss of depuration compounds for indoor air and behaved as predicted. A single R-value of 2.6m(3)d(-1) was calculated from the mean of 12 samplers deployed indoors from three harvest dates with a range of 2.0-3.4m(3)d(-1) for both uptake of native PCBs and loss of depuration compounds. Loss of depuration compounds in outdoor air also followed the predicted linear behavior with a range of calculated R-value of 4.4-8.4m(3)d(-1). Uptake of native PCBs behavior was extremely variable, probably due to changes in ambient air concentrations and resulted in R-values of 1.6-11.5m(3)d(-1) with greater variation seen in higher chlorinated homolog groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19068264      PMCID: PMC2657292          DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  20 in total

1.  Milwaukee, WI, as a source of atmospheric PCBs to Lake Michigan.

Authors:  David M Wethington; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Passive air sampling theory for semivolatile organic compounds.

Authors:  Michael E Bartkow; Kees Booij; Karen E Kennedy; Jochen F Müller; Darryl W Hawker
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Advances in passive sampling in environmental studies.

Authors:  Agata Kot-Wasik; Bozena Zabiegała; Magdalena Urbanowicz; Ewa Dominiak; Andrzej Wasik; Jacek Namieśnik
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 6.558

4.  Polyurethane foam (PUF) disks passive air samplers: wind effect on sampling rates.

Authors:  Ludovic Tuduri; Tom Harner; Hayley Hung
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Field deployment of thin film passive air samplers for persistent organic pollutants: a study in the urban atmospheric boundary layer.

Authors:  N J Farrar; T Harner; M Shoeib; A Sweetman; K C Jones
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Passive-sampler derived air concentrations of persistent organic pollutants on a north-south transect in Chile.

Authors:  Karla Pozo; Tom Harner; Mahiba Shoeib; Roberto Urrutia; Ricardo Barra; Oscar Parra; Silvano Focardi
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Using passive air samplers to assess urban-rural trends for persistent organic pollutants and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. 2. Seasonal trends for PAHs, PCBs, and organochlorine pesticides.

Authors:  Anne Motelay-Massei; Tom Harner; Mahiba Shoeib; Miriam Diamond; Gary Stern; Bruno Rosenberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Passive and active air samplers as complementary methods for investigating persistent organic pollutants in the Great Lakes Basin.

Authors:  T Gouin; T Harner; P Blanchard; D Mackay
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Global pilot study for persistent organic pollutants (POPs) using PUF disk passive air samplers.

Authors:  Tom Harner; Karla Pozo; Todd Gouin; Anne-Marie Macdonald; Hayley Hung; Jill Cainey; Andrew Peters
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Spatial and temporal trends of chiral organochlorine signatures in Great Lakes air using passive air samplers.

Authors:  T Gouin; L Jantunen; T Harner; P Blanchard; T Bidleman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  8 in total

1.  Simulating and explaining passive air sampling rates for semivolatile compounds on polyurethane foam passive samplers.

Authors:  Nicholas T Petrich; Scott N Spak; Gregory R Carmichael; Dingfei Hu; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Spatial distribution of airborne polychlorinated biphenyls in Cleveland, Ohio and Chicago, Illinois.

Authors:  Carolyn Persoon; Thomas M Peters; Naresh Kumar; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Calibration and evaluation of PUF-PAS sampling rates across the Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling (GAPS) network.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Scott N Spak; Austen Smith; Jasmin K Schuster; Tom Harner; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.238

4.  Airborne PCBs and OH-PCBs Inside and Outside Urban and Rural U.S. Schools.

Authors:  Rachel F Marek; Peter S Thorne; Nicholas J Herkert; Andrew M Awad; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Synthetic Musk Fragrances in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant with Lime Softening.

Authors:  William D Wombacher; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Eng (New York)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.860

6.  Effects of room airflow on accurate determination of PUF-PAS sampling rates in the indoor environment.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.238

7.  Inhalation and dietary exposure to PCBs in urban and rural cohorts via congener-specific measurements.

Authors:  Matt D Ampleman; Andrés Martinez; Jeanne DeWall; Dorothea F K Rawn; Keri C Hornbuckle; Peter S Thorne
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  A Model Using Local Weather Data to Determine the Effective Sampling Volume for PCB Congeners Collected on Passive Air Samplers.

Authors:  Nicholas J Herkert; Andres Martinez; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 9.028

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.