Literature DB >> 19066948

Dimension- and space-based intertrial effects in visual pop-out search: modulation by task demands for focal-attentional processing.

Joseph Krummenacher1, Hermann J Müller, Michael Zehetleitner, Thomas Geyer.   

Abstract

Two experiments compared reaction times (RTs) in visual search for singleton feature targets defined, variably across trials, in either the color or the orientation dimension. Experiment 1 required observers to simply discern target presence versus absence (simple-detection task); Experiment 2 required them to respond to a detection-irrelevant form attribute of the target (compound-search task). Experiment 1 revealed a marked dimensional intertrial effect of 34 ms for an target defined in a changed versus a repeated dimension, and an intertrial target distance effect, with an 4-ms increase in RTs (per unit of distance) as the separation of the current relative to the preceding target increased. Conversely, in Experiment 2, the dimension change effect was markedly reduced (11 ms), while the intertrial target distance effect was markedly increased (11 ms per unit of distance). The results suggest that dimension change/repetition effects are modulated by the amount of attentional focusing required by the task, with space-based attention altering the integration of dimension-specific feature contrast signals at the level of the overall-saliency map.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19066948     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0206-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  25 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions.

Authors:  Karen Mortier; Jan Theeuwes; Peter Starreveld
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Reallocation of visual attention.

Authors:  R Egly; D Homa
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Cross-trial priming of element positions in visual pop-out search is dependent on stimulus arrangement.

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Hermann J Müller; Joseph Krummenacher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Distinct, but top-down modulable color and positional priming mechanisms in visual pop-out search.

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-10

7.  Feature integration theory revisited: dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search.

Authors:  Louis K H Chan; William G Hayward
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: investigating a "dimension-weighting" account.

Authors:  A Found; H J Müller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-01

9.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.

Authors:  H J Müller; D Heller; J Ziegler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

10.  Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Klaus Gramann; Hermann J Müller; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  6 in total

1.  Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? Attention, response rules, distractors, and eye movements.

Authors:  Matthew D Hilchey; Victoria Antinucci; Dominique Lamy; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

2.  Dynamic weighting of feature dimensions in visual search: behavioral and psychophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Joseph Krummenacher; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-02

3.  The effect of search mode on dimension weighting.

Authors:  Takatsune Kumada
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-06

4.  Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction.

Authors:  Harriet Goschy; Sarolta Bakos; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-06

5.  Inter-trial effects in visual pop-out search: Factorial comparison of Bayesian updating models.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Ahu Gokce; Thomas Geyer; Artyom Zinchenko; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.