Literature DB >> 19170475

Feature integration theory revisited: dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search.

Louis K H Chan1, William G Hayward.   

Abstract

In feature integration theory (FIT; A. Treisman & S. Sato, 1990), feature detection is driven by independent dimensional modules, and other searches are driven by a master map of locations that integrates dimensional information into salience signals. Although recent theoretical models have largely abandoned this distinction, some observed results are difficult to explain in its absence. The present study measured dimension-specific performance during detection and localization, tasks that require operation of dimensional modules and the master map, respectively. Results showed a dissociation between tasks in terms of both dimension-switching costs and cross-dimension attentional capture, reflecting a dimension-specific nature for detection tasks and a dimension-general nature for localization tasks. In a feature-discrimination task, results precluded an explanation based on response mode. These results are interpreted to support FIT's postulation that different mechanisms are involved in parallel and focal attention searches. This indicates that the FIT architecture should be adopted to explain the current results and that a variety of visual attention findings can be addressed within this framework. Copyright 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19170475     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Dimension- and space-based intertrial effects in visual pop-out search: modulation by task demands for focal-attentional processing.

Authors:  Joseph Krummenacher; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner; Thomas Geyer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-10

2.  Signal detection evidence for limited capacity in visual search.

Authors:  Evan M Palmer; David E Fencsik; Stephen J Flusberg; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Automatic feature-based grouping during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Brian P Keane; Everett Mettler; Todd S Horowitz; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Klaus Gramann; Hermann J Müller; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Recovery of visual search following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe; Kayela Robertson
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Michael Zehetleitner; Klaus Gramann; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Size matters: large objects capture attention in visual search.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The importance of being relevant.

Authors:  Snehlata Jaswal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.