Literature DB >> 15982130

Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions.

Karen Mortier1, Jan Theeuwes, Peter Starreveld.   

Abstract

In feature search tasks, uncertainty about the dimension on which targets differ from the nontargets hampers search performance relative to a situation in which this dimension is known in advance. Typically, these cross-dimensional costs are associated with less efficient guidance of attention to the target. In the present study, participants either had to perform a feature search task or had to perform a nonsearch task, that is, respond to a target presented without nontargets. The target varied either in one dimension or across dimensions. The results showed similar effects both in search and nonsearch conditions: Preknowledge of the target dimension gave shorter response times than when the dimension was unknown. Similar results were found using a trial-by-trial cueing. It is concluded that effects that typically have been attributed to early top-down modulation of attentional guidance may represent effects that occur later in processing. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982130     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

1.  How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Dragan Rangelov; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Testing a postselectional account of across-dimension switch costs.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

3.  Dimension- and space-based intertrial effects in visual pop-out search: modulation by task demands for focal-attentional processing.

Authors:  Joseph Krummenacher; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner; Thomas Geyer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-10

4.  Priming of pop-out modulates attentional target selection in visual search: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss; Theodore Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Klaus Gramann; Hermann J Müller; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The role of context in volitional control of feature-based attention.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Dynamic weighting of feature dimensions in visual search: behavioral and psychophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Joseph Krummenacher; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-02

8.  Combined contributions of feedforward and feedback inputs to bottom-up attention.

Authors:  Peyman Khorsand; Tirin Moore; Alireza Soltani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-02

9.  A salient and task-irrelevant collinear structure hurts visual search.

Authors:  Chia-Huei Tseng; Li Jingling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of task-related learned representations in explaining asymmetries in task switching.

Authors:  Ayla Barutchu; Stefanie I Becker; Olivia Carter; Robert Hester; Neil L Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.