Literature DB >> 1906531

Accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide tension analyzers.

D B Raemer1, I Calalang.   

Abstract

Substantial mean differences between arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) and end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PETCO2) in anesthesia and intensive care settings have been demonstrated by a number of investigators. We have explored the technical causes of error in the measurement of PETCO2 that could contribute to the observed differences. In a clinical setting, the measurement of PETCO2 is accomplished with one of three types of instruments, infrared analyzers, mass spectrometers, and Raman spectrometers, whose specified accuracies are typically +/- 2, +/- 1.5, and +/- 0.5 mm Hg, respectively. We examined potential errors in PETCO2 measurement with respect to the analyzer, sampling system, environment, and instrument. Various analyzer error sources were measured, including stability, warm-up time, interference from nitrous oxide and oxygen, pressure, noise, and response time. Other error sources, including calibration, resistance in the sample catheter, pressure changes, water vapor, liquid water, and end-tidal detection algorithms, were considered and are discussed. On the basis of our measurements and analysis, we estimate the magnitude of the major potential errors for an uncompensated infrared analyzer as: inaccuracy, 2 mm Hg; resolution, 0.5 mm Hg; noise, 2 mm Hg; instability (12 hours), 3 mm Hg; miscalibration, 1 mm Hg; selectivity (70% nitrous oxide), 6.5 mm Hg; selectivity (100% oxygen), -2.5 mm Hg; atmospheric pressure change, less than 1 mm Hg; airway pressure at 30 cm H2O, 2 mm Hg; positive end-expiratory pressure or continuous positive airway pressure at 20 cm H2O, 1.5 mm Hg; sampling system resistance, less than 1 mm Hg; and water vapor, 2.5 mm Hg. In addition to these errors, other systematic mistakes such as an inaccurate end-tidal detection algorithm, poor calibration technique, or liquid water contamination can lead to gross inaccuracies. In a clinical setting, unless the user is confident that all of the technical error sources have been eliminated and the physiologic factors are known, depending on PETCO2 to determine PaCO2 is not advised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1906531     DOI: 10.1007/bf01618124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  17 in total

1.  Correction factors for infrared carbon dioxide pressure broadening by nitrogen, nitrous oxide and cyclopropane.

Authors:  J W SEVERINGHAUS; C P LARSON; E I EGER
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1961 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Respiratory dead space and arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension difference in anesthetized man.

Authors:  J F NUNN; D W HILL
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1960-05       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Insurance incentives and the use of monitoring devices.

Authors:  G L Zeitlin; W A Cass; J S Gessner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Can the Raman scattering analyzer compete with mass spectrometers: an affirmative reply.

Authors:  D R Westenskow; D L Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1989-01

5.  End-tidal CO2 excretion waveform and error with gas sampling line leak.

Authors:  J Zupan; M Martin; J L Benumof
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Increases in arterial to end-tidal CO2 tension differences after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  J Bermudez; M Lichtiger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Determinants of distortions in CO2 catheter sampling systems: a mathematical model.

Authors:  R A Epstein; A M Reznik; M A Epstein
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  1980-07

8.  Multipatient anesthetic mass spectrometry: rapid analysis of data stored in long catheters.

Authors:  G M Ozanne; W G Young; W J Mazzei; J W Severinghaus
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Variation in PCO2 between arterial blood and peak expired gas during anesthesia.

Authors:  D B Raemer; D Francis; J H Philip; R A Gabel
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Estimation of PaCO2 by two noninvasive methods in the critically ill newborn infant.

Authors:  M F Epstein; A R Cohen; H A Feldman; D B Raemer
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Capnometry and anaesthesia.

Authors:  K Bhavani-Shankar; H Moseley; A Y Kumar; Y Delph
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  A new calibration method that compensates for the effects of O2 and N2 on infrared CO2 analysers.

Authors:  Yongquan Tang; Martin J Turner; A Barry Baker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Practical CO2 monitoring in anaesthesia.

Authors:  R L Knill
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  End-tidal PCO2 monitoring via nasal cannulae in pediatric patients: accuracy and sources of error.

Authors:  R H Friesen; M Alswang
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1996-03

5.  Carbon dioxide analysers: accuracy, alarm limits and effects of interfering gases.

Authors:  R Lauber; B Seeberger; A M Zbinden
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Improved response time with a new miniaturised main-stream multigas monitor.

Authors:  Mattias Berggren; Nasser Hosseini; Krister Nilsson; Ola Stenqvist
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Comparison of end-tidal CO2 measured by transportable capnometer (EMMA™ capnograph) and arterial pCO2 in general anesthesia.

Authors:  Kyung Woo Kim; Hey Ran Choi; Si Ra Bang; Jeong-Wook Lee
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 8.  Cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants: etiology and monitoring technologies.

Authors:  J M Di Fiore; C F Poets; E Gauda; R J Martin; P MacFarlane
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Flow-through versus sidestream capnometry for detection of end tidal carbon dioxide in the sedated patient.

Authors:  Derek J Sakata; Isao Matsubara; Nishant A Gopalakrishnan; Dwayne R Westenskow; Julia L White; Shinji Yamamori; Talmage D Egan; Nathan L Pace
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  An unusual foreign body in breathing circuit detected by capnography.

Authors:  Shivendu Bansal; Sohan Lal Solanki; Rupesh Yadav
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jul-Dec
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.