Literature DB >> 19064490

Progressive locomotor recalibration during blind walking.

John W Philbeck1, Adam J Woods, Joeanna Arthur, Jennifer Todd.   

Abstract

Blind walking has become a common measure of perceived target location. This article addresses the possibility that blind walking might vary systematically within an experimental session as participants accrue exposure to nonvisual locomotion. Such variations could complicate the interpretation of blind walking as a measure of perceived location. We measured walked distance, velocity, and pace length in indoor and outdoor environments (1.5-16.0 m target distances). Walked distance increased over 37 trials by approximately 9.33% of the target distance; velocity (and to a lesser extent, pace length) also increased, primarily in the first few trials. In addition, participants exhibited more unintentional forward drift in a blindfolded marching-in-place task after exposure to nonvisual walking. The results suggest that participants not only gain confidence as blind-walking exposure increases, but also adapt to nonvisual walking in a way that biases responses toward progressively longer walked distances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19064490      PMCID: PMC2892263          DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.8.1459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  23 in total

1.  The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation.

Authors:  D Elliott
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets.

Authors:  J J Rieser; D H Ashmead; C R Talor; G A Youngquist
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Vestibular-Podokinetic interaction without vestibular perception.

Authors:  G Melvill Jones; W A Fletcher; K D Weber; E W Block
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: implications for real and virtual indoor environments.

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr; Peter Willemsen; Amy A Gooch; William B Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing.

Authors:  P Vindras; P Viviani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action.

Authors:  J W Philbeck; J M Loomis; A C Beall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-05

7.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions.

Authors:  J W Philbeck; J M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Aftereffects from jogging.

Authors:  S Anstis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Haptic perception of the distance walked when blindfolded.

Authors:  M Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A comparison of visual and nonvisual sensory inputs to walked distance in a blind-walking task.

Authors:  Colin G Ellard; Sarah C Shaughnessy
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  15 in total

1.  Treadmill experience mediates the perceptual-motor aftereffect of treadmill walking.

Authors:  Allison A Brennan; Jonathan Z Bakdash; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Interrelations between the perception of time and space in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Martin Riemer; Rupert Hölzl; Dieter Kleinböhl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interactive footstep sounds modulate the perceptual-motor aftereffect of treadmill walking.

Authors:  Luca Turchet; Ivan Camponogara; Paola Cesari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The Roles for Prior Visual Experience and Age on the Extraction of Egocentric Distance.

Authors:  Courtney P Wallin; Daniel A Gajewski; Rebeca W Teplitz; Sandra Mihelic Jaidzeka; John W Philbeck
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Assessing the relative contribution of vision to odometry via manipulations of gait in an over-ground homing task.

Authors:  Steven J Harrison; Nicholas Reynolds; Brandon Bishoff; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Angular declination and the dynamic perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; John W Philbeck; Philip W Wirtz; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The visual system's intrinsic bias and knowledge of size mediate perceived size and location in the dark.

Authors:  Liu Zhou; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The visual system's intrinsic bias influences space perception in the impoverished environment.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Does perceptual-motor calibration generalize across two different forms of locomotion? Investigations of walking and wheelchairs.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kunz; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; William B Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.