Literature DB >> 23751007

The visual system's intrinsic bias and knowledge of size mediate perceived size and location in the dark.

Liu Zhou1, Zijiang J He, Teng Leng Ooi.   

Abstract

Dimly lit targets in the dark are perceived as located about an implicit slanted surface that delineates the visual system's intrinsic bias (Ooi, Wu, & He, 2001). If the intrinsic bias reflects the internal model of visual space-as proposed here-its influence should extend beyond target localization. Our first 2 experiments demonstrated that the intrinsic bias also influences perceived target size. We employed a size-matching task and an action task to measure the perceived size of a dimly lit target at various locations in the dark. Then using the size distance invariance hypothesis along with the accurately perceived target angular declination, we converted the perceived sizes to locations. We found that the derived locations from the size judgment tasks can be fitted by slanted curves that resemble the intrinsic bias profile from judged target locations. Our third experiment revealed that armed with the explicit knowledge of target size, an observer perceives target locations in the dark following an intrinsic bias-like profile that is shifted slightly farther from the observer than the profile obtained without knowledge of target size (i.e., slightly more veridical). Altogether, we showed that the intrinsic bias serves as an internal model, or memory, of ground surface layouts when the visual system cannot rely on external depth information. This memory/model can also be weakly influenced by top-down knowledge. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23751007      PMCID: PMC3876294          DOI: 10.1037/a0033088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  54 in total

1.  Use of interreflection and shadow for surface contact.

Authors:  C Madison; W Thompson; D Kersten; P Shirley; B Smits
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

2.  Distance perception across spatial discontinuities.

Authors:  J C Meng; H A Sedgwick
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-01

3.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

4.  The linear perspective information in ground surface representation and distance judgment.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-07

5.  Local and non-local effects on surface-mediated stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  Barbara J Gillam; Harold A Sedgwick; Phillip Marlow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Environmental surfaces and the compression of perceived visual space.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; George J Andersen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Apparent motion determined by surface layout not by disparity or three-dimensional distance.

Authors:  Z J He; K Nakayama
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The role of suggested size in distance responses.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-08

9.  A statistical explanation of visual space.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; Dale Purves
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Anisotropic encoding of three-dimensional space by place cells and grid cells.

Authors:  Robin Hayman; Madeleine A Verriotis; Aleksandar Jovalekic; André A Fenton; Kathryn J Jeffery
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Effects of Age and Set Size on the Fast Extraction of Egocentric Distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-01-22

2.  Attention modulates perception of visual space.

Authors:  Liu Zhou; Chenglong Deng; Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2016-12-19

3.  The visible ground surface as a reference frame for scaling binocular depth of a target in midair.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Liu Zhou; Pan Shi; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The visual system's intrinsic bias influences space perception in the impoverished environment.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Subjectivity: A Case of Biological Individuation and an Adaptive Response to Informational Overflow.

Authors:  Jakub Jonkisz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-09

6.  Intrinsic spatial knowledge about terrestrial ecology favors the tall for judging distance.

Authors:  Liu Zhou; Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Egocentric Distance Perception Disorder in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Bo Dong; Airui Chen; Tianyang Zhang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Belg       Date:  2021-06-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.