Literature DB >> 1906418

Two modes of balancing selection in Drosophila melanogaster: overcompensation and overdominance.

T X Peng1, A Moya, F J Ayala.   

Abstract

Overdominance is often invoked to account for the extensive polymorphisms found in natural populations of organisms; overcompensation, however, may be equally or more important. Overcompensation occurs when limiting resources are better exploited by a genetically mixed than by a uniform population, and is often causally related to frequency-dependent selection. We have designed experiments to test whether overcompensation occurs in Drosophila melanogaster, using the Sod locus as a marker. Tests are made at each of two densities and two temperatures for cultures with desired genetic compositions. Both temperature and density have statistically significant effects on the per-female productivity of the cultures. More important, there are strong effects due to overcompensation. Cultures that are more polymorphic are also more productive than less polymorphic ones even when the level of individual heterozygosity is the same in all. There is also overdominance for the Sod locus: the heterozygotes are more productive than either homozygote at every temperature and density, and the differences are statistically significant in several cases. These results corroborate previous studies showing that overdominance may contribute to the maintenance of the Sod polymorphisms. Moreover, our results indicate that the significance of overcompensation as a mechanism to account for polymorphism in natural populations deserves further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1906418      PMCID: PMC1204475     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  37 in total

1.  Are the MN blood group maintained by selection?

Authors:  N E MORTON; C S CHUNG
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1959-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Competition among Genotypes in Tribolium Castaneum at Varying Densities and Gene Frequencies (the Black Locus).

Authors:  R R Sokal; I Karten
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Irradiation-resistance conferred by superoxide dismutase: possible adaptive role of a natural polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T X Peng; A Moya; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The evolution of plant reproductive characters; sexual versus natural selection.

Authors:  D Charlesworth; D W Schemske; V L Sork
Journal:  Experientia Suppl       Date:  1987

5.  Genetic Differentiation between Geographically Distant Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  R S Singh; D A Hickey; J David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The contribution of ecological genetics to evolutionary theory: detecting the direct effects of natural selection on particular polymorphic loci.

Authors:  B Clarke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Density- and frequency-dependent selection at the Mdh-2 locus in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  M Tosić; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Fitness of allozyme variants in Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Selection at the PGM-1 and Me-2 loci.

Authors:  D Marinković; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni.

Authors:  F J Ayala; J R Powell; M L Tracey; C A Mourão; S Pérez-Salas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Polymorphisms in continental and island populations of Drosophila willistoni.

Authors:  F J Ayala; J R Powell; T Dobzhansky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Molecular evolution of two linked genes, Est-6 and Sod, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E S Balakirev; E I Balakirev; F Rodríguez-Trelles; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Overcompensation as a mechanism for maintaining polymorphism: egg-to-adult viability in Drosophila.

Authors:  M Milosević; A Moya; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  DNA variation at the Sod locus of Drosophila melanogaster: an unfolding story of natural selection.

Authors:  R R Hudson; A G Sáez; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R R Hudson; K Bailey; D Skarecky; J Kwiatowski; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Trade-off between toxicity and signal detection orchestrated by frequency- and density-dependent genes.

Authors:  Laury Arthaud; Selim Ben Rokia-Mille; Hussein Raad; Aviv Dombrovsky; Nicolas Prevost; Maria Capovilla; Alain Robichon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.