Literature DB >> 19063781

Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of cardiology.

Kathy J Jenkins1, Robert H Beekman Iii, Lisa J Bergersen, Allen D Everett, Thomas J Forbes, Rodney C G Franklin, Thomas S Klitzner, Otto N Krogman, Gerard R Martin, Catherine L Webb.   

Abstract

This review includes a brief discussion, from the perspective of the pediatric cardiologist, of the rationale for creation and maintenance of multi-institutional databases of outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease, together with a history of the evolution of such databases, and a description of the current state of the art. A number of projects designed to have broad-based impact are currently in the design phase, or have already been implemented. Not surprisingly, most of the efforts thus far have focused on catheterization procedures and interventions, although some work examining other aspects of paediatric cardiology practice is also beginning. This review briefly describes several European and North American initiatives related to databases for pediatric and congenital cardiology including the Central Cardiac Audit Database of the United Kingdom, national database initiatives for pediatric cardiology in Switzerland and Germany, various database initiatives under the leadership of the Working Groups of The Association for European Paediatric Cardiology, the IMPACT Registry (IMproving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatment) of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry of The American College of Cardiology Foundation and The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), the Mid-Atlantic Group of Interventional Cardiology (MAGIC) Catheterization Outcomes Project, the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes (C3PO), the Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium (CCISC), and the Joint Council on Congenital Heart Disease (JCCHD) National Quality Improvement Initiative. These projects, each leveraging multicentre data and collaboration, demonstrate the enormous progress that has occurred over the last several years to improve the quality and consistency of information about nonsurgical treatment for congenital cardiac disease. The paediatric cardiology field is well-poised to move quickly beyond outcome assessment and benchmarking, to collaborative quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19063781     DOI: 10.1017/S1047951108002825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol Young        ISSN: 1047-9511            Impact factor:   1.093


  12 in total

1.  Pediatric cardiovascular device registries--the need for such data and the potential impact.

Authors:  Francesca Joseph
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  How Slow Can We Go? 4 Frames Per Second (fps) Versus 7.5 fps Fluoroscopy for Atrial Septal Defects (ASDs) Device Closure.

Authors:  Gurumurthy Hiremath; Jeffery Meadows; Phillip Moore
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Use of an administrative database to determine clinical management and outcomes in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Howard P Gutgesell; Diane G Hillman; Kimberly E McHugh; Peter Dean; G Paul Matherne
Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg       Date:  2011-10-01

4.  Adjusting for Risk Associated With Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Catheterization: A Report From the NCDR IMPACT Registry.

Authors:  Natalie Jayaram; Robert H Beekman; Lee Benson; Ralf Holzer; Kathy Jenkins; Kevin F Kennedy; Gerard R Martin; John W Moore; Richard Ringel; Jonathan Rome; John A Spertus; Robert Vincent; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Opportunities and challenges in linking information across databases in pediatric cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Sara K Pasqual; Jennifer S Li; Marshall L Jacobs; Samir S Shah; Jeffrey P Jacobs
Journal:  Prog Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-01

6.  Modeling Major Adverse Outcomes of Pediatric and Adult Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization: Observations From the NCDR IMPACT Registry (National Cardiovascular Data Registry Improving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatment).

Authors:  Natalie Jayaram; John A Spertus; Kevin F Kennedy; Robert Vincent; Gerard R Martin; Jeptha P Curtis; David Nykanen; Phillip M Moore; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Impact of Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes-Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI) in LMICs.

Authors:  Fatima Ali; Mohammad Qasim Mehdi; Saleem Akhtar; Nadeem Aslam; Rashid Abbas; Izat Shah; Jabbir Abidi; Sajid Arthur; Zeenat Nizar; Andrea Goodmann; Lisa Bergersen; Babar Hasan
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2019-01-10

8.  How do we define success in pediatric cardiac care?

Authors:  Shyam S Kothari
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-07

9.  Selection by a panel of clinicians and family representatives of important early morbidities associated with paediatric cardiac surgery suitable for routine monitoring using the nominal group technique and a robust voting process.

Authors:  Christina Pagel; Katherine L Brown; Isobel McLeod; Helen Jepps; Jo Wray; Linda Chigaru; Andrew McLean; Tom Treasure; Victor Tsang; Martin Utley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Public health science agenda for congenital heart defects: report from a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention experts meeting.

Authors:  Matthew E Oster; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Regina M Simeone; Michelle Gurvitz; Jonathan R Kaltman; Michael McConnell; Geoffrey L Rosenthal; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.