Literature DB >> 19061201

Quantifying the recruitment challenges with couple-based interventions for cancer: applications to early-stage breast cancer.

Steffany J Fredman1, Donald H Baucom, Tina M Gremore, Angela M Castellani, Theresa A Kallman, Laura S Porter, Jennifer S Kirby, E Claire Dees, Nancy Klauber-Demore, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Lisa A Carey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite mounting evidence supporting the use of psychosocial interventions to promote adaptation to cancer, enrolling participants into these interventions is challenging. This is particularly salient for couple-based interventions, and newer, more targeted recruitment strategies to increase enrollment are needed. However, there have been few published empirical studies focused specifically on recruitment-related variables associated with enrollment into these types of interventions. To better understand how to encourage participation in couple-based psychosocial interventions for cancer, we examined facilitating and impeding factors to enrollment into a couple-based intervention for women with early-stage breast cancer.
METHOD: In this sample of 99 women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer, patient demographic variables and method of approaching eligible patients were examined as predictors of enrollment into a randomized controlled trial comparing couple-based relationship enhancement with treatment as usual.
RESULTS: Results indicated that women were more likely to enroll if they were contacted at home or at a follow-up medical appointment rather than when first diagnosed at a busy multidisciplinary clinic; they were also more likely to enroll the closer they lived to the research facility.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to decreasing participant burden, timing and setting of recruitment efforts may have important implications for enhancing participation rates in couple-based intervention studies for cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19061201      PMCID: PMC4506748          DOI: 10.1002/pon.1477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  27 in total

1.  Application of the CuSum technique to evaluate changes in recruitment strategies.

Authors:  Patrick McNees; Karen Hassey Dow; Victoria Wochna Loerzel
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  T L Albrecht; C Blanchard; J C Ruckdeschel; M Coovert; R Strongbow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment.

Authors:  P N Lara; R Higdon; N Lim; K Kwan; M Tanaka; D H Lau; T Wun; J Welborn; F J Meyers; S Christensen; R O'Donnell; C Richman; S A Scudder; J Tuscano; D R Gandara; K S Lam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.

Authors:  F Corbett; J Oldham; R Lilford
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  A randomized clinical trial of group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management in localized prostate cancer: development of stress management skills improves quality of life and benefit finding.

Authors:  Frank J Penedo; Ivan Molton; Jason R Dahn; Biing-Jiun Shen; Dave Kinsinger; Lara Traeger; Scott Siegel; Neil Schneiderman; Michael Antoni
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-06

6.  Factors associated with breast cancer clinical trials participation and enrollment at a large academic medical center.

Authors:  Michael S Simon; Wei Du; Lawrence Flaherty; Philip A Philip; Patricia Lorusso; Cheryl Miree; Daryn Smith; Diane R Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  "Does one size fit all?" moderators in psychosocial interventions for breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tanja Zimmermann; Nina Heinrichs; Donald H Baucom
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec

8.  Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: who are these patients and how did they get there?

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Raburn Mallory; Asefeh Heiat; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Feasibility of a dyadic intervention for management of osteoarthritis: a pilot study with older patients and their spousal caregivers.

Authors:  L M Martire; R Schulz; F J Keefe; T W Starz; T A Osial; M A Dew; C F Reynolds
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.658

View more
  28 in total

1.  Challenges and strategies for recruitment and retention of vulnerable research participants: promoting the benefits of participation.

Authors:  Robin Gemmill; Anna Cathy Williams; Liz Cooke; Marcia Grant
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.257

2.  Multiple family groups for adult cancer survivors and their families: a 1-day workshop model.

Authors:  Peter Steinglass; Jamie S Ostroff; Abbe Stahl Steinglass
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2011-09

3.  A dance intervention for cancer survivors and their partners (RHYTHM).

Authors:  Maria Pisu; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Kelly M Kenzik; Robert A Oster; Chee Paul Lin; Sharon Manne; Ronald Alvarez; Michelle Y Martin
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 4.  Psychosocial interventions for patients and caregivers in the age of new communication technologies: opportunities and challenges in cancer care.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Cindy L Carmack; Michael A Diefenbach
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-01-28

5.  A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Laura S Porter; Katelyn R Regan; Francis J Keefe; Nilofer S Azad; Luis A Diaz; Joseph M Herman; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Talia Zaider; David Kissane; David Lee; Isaac Y Kim; Carolyn J Heckman; Frank J Penedo; Evangelynn Murphy; Shannon Myers Virtue
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2019-03-10

7.  Pilot feasibility study of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Laura S Porter; Tamara J Somers; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2012

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Paul Krebs
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Responding to a significant recruitment challenge within three nationwide psychoeducational trials for cancer patients.

Authors:  Annette L Stanton; Marion E Morra; Michael A Diefenbach; Suzanne M Miller; Rosemarie Slevin Perocchia; Peter C Raich; Linda Fleisher; Kuang-Yi Wen; Zung Vu Tran; Nihal E Mohamed; Roshini George; Mary Anne Bright; Alfred C Marcus
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Adapting a couple-based intimacy enhancement intervention to breast cancer: A developmental study.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Laura S Porter; Kristen E Casale; Elissa T Bantug; Sharon L Bober; Sharon C Schwartz; Katherine Clegg Smith
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.