Literature DB >> 10506636

Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials.

T L Albrecht1, C Blanchard, J C Ruckdeschel, M Coovert, R Strongbow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical trials are the primary means for determining new, effective treatments for cancer patients, yet the number of patients that accrue is relatively limited. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between physician behavior and patient accrual to a clinical trial by videotaping the interaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patient-physician interactions involving 12 different oncologists were videotaped in several clinics at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute (Tampa, FL). The purpose of each interaction was to present the possibility of a clinical trial to the patient. A coding system, the Moffitt Accrual Analysis System, was developed by the authors to code behaviors that represented both the legal-informational and social influence models of communication behavior. Thirty-two patients agreed to participate in the clinical trial.
RESULTS: Videotaping was found to be a viable, valid, and reliable method for studying the interaction. Physicians who were observed to use both models of influence were found to enroll more patients. Thus, patients were more likely to accrue to the trial when their physician verbally presented items normally included in an informed consent document and when they behaved in a reflective, patient-centered, supportive, and responsive manner. Discussion of benefits, side effects, patient concerns and resources to manage the concerns were all associated with accrual.
CONCLUSION: This research has implications for modifying physician behavior and, thus, increasing the numbers of patients accruing to oncology clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10506636     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  40 in total

1.  Donating tissue for research: patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Allison R Baer; Mary Lou Smith; Johanna C Bendell
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  A prospective analysis of the influence of older age on physician and patient decision-making when considering enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials (SWOG S0316).

Authors:  Sara H Javid; Joseph M Unger; Julie R Gralow; Carol M Moinpour; Antoinette J Wozniak; J Wendall Goodwin; Primo N Lara; Pamela A Williams; Laura F Hutchins; Carolyn C Gotay; Kathy S Albain
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-06-20

3.  BALANCE: a large simple trial of maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  John R Geddes; Jennifer M Rendell; Guy M Goodwin
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors.

Authors:  Claudia R Baquet; Patricia Commiskey; C Daniel Mullins; Shiraz I Mishra
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2006-02-21

Review 5.  Randomized controlled trial versus comparative cohort study in verifying the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Yukiharu Todo; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Power of an effective clinical conversation: improving accrual onto clinical trials.

Authors:  Linda K Parreco; Rhonda W DeJoice; Holly A Massett; Rose Mary Padberg; Sona S Thakkar
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Variation in question asking during cancer clinical interactions: a potential source of disparities in access to information.

Authors:  Susan Eggly; Felicity W K Harper; Louis A Penner; Marci J Gleason; Tanina Foster; Terrance L Albrecht
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-04-28

8.  Oncologists' recommendations of clinical trial participation to patients.

Authors:  Susan Eggly; Terrance L Albrecht; Felicity W K Harper; Tanina Foster; Melissa M Franks; John C Ruckdeschel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-11-05

9.  The influence of patient expectations regarding cure on treatment decisions.

Authors:  Marci E J Gleason; Felicity W K Harper; Susan Eggly; John C Ruckdeschel; Terrance L Albrecht
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-01-14

Review 10.  A descriptive analysis of state legislation and policy addressing clinical trials participation.

Authors:  Claudia R Baquet; Shiraz I Mishra; Armin D Weinberg
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2009-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.