Literature DB >> 19060143

Comparison of responses to double-strand breaks between Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis reveals different requirements for SOS induction.

Lyle A Simmons1, Alexi I Goranov, Hajime Kobayashi, Bryan W Davies, Daniel S Yuan, Alan D Grossman, Graham C Walker.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks are particularly deleterious lesions that can lead to genomic instability and cell death. We investigated the SOS response to double-strand breaks in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. In E. coli, double-strand breaks induced by ionizing radiation resulted in SOS induction in virtually every cell. E. coli strains incapable of SOS induction were sensitive to ionizing radiation. In striking contrast, we found that in B. subtilis both ionizing radiation and a site-specific double-strand break causes induction of prophage PBSX and SOS gene expression in only a small subpopulation of cells. These results show that double-strand breaks provoke global SOS induction in E. coli but not in B. subtilis. Remarkably, RecA-GFP focus formation was nearly identical following ionizing radiation challenge in both E. coli and B. subtilis, demonstrating that formation of RecA-GFP foci occurs in response to double-strand breaks but does not require or result in SOS induction in B. subtilis. Furthermore, we found that B. subtilis cells incapable of inducing SOS had near wild-type levels of survival in response to ionizing radiation. Moreover, B. subtilis RecN contributes to maintaining low levels of SOS induction during double-strand break repair. Thus, we found that the contribution of SOS induction to double-strand break repair differs substantially between E. coli and B. subtilis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19060143      PMCID: PMC2632013          DOI: 10.1128/JB.01292-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  84 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal organization of the Bacillus subtilis replication cycle.

Authors:  Melanie B Berkmen; Alan D Grossman
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  The AddAB helicase/nuclease forms a stable complex with its cognate chi sequence during translocation.

Authors:  Frédéric Chédin; Naofumi Handa; Mark S Dillingham; Stephen C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  DinI and RecX modulate RecA-DNA structures in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Nicholas Renzette; Nathan Gumlaw; Steven J Sandler
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  UvrD limits the number and intensities of RecA-green fluorescent protein structures in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Richard C Centore; Steven J Sandler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Replication is required for the RecA localization response to DNA damage in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Lyle A Simmons; Alan D Grossman; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The forespore line of gene expression in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Stephanie T Wang; Barbara Setlow; Erin M Conlon; Jessica L Lyon; Daisuke Imamura; Tsutomu Sato; Peter Setlow; Richard Losick; Patrick Eichenberger
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Characterization of the global transcriptional responses to different types of DNA damage and disruption of replication in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Alexi I Goranov; Elke Kuester-Schoeck; Jue D Wang; Alan D Grossman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  A systems approach to mapping DNA damage response pathways.

Authors:  Christopher T Workman; H Craig Mak; Scott McCuine; Jean-Bosco Tagne; Maya Agarwal; Owen Ozier; Thomas J Begley; Leona D Samson; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Regulation of bacterial RecA protein function.

Authors:  Michael M Cox
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.250

10.  Mycobacteriophage exploit NHEJ to facilitate genome circularization.

Authors:  Robert S Pitcher; Louise M Tonkin; James M Daley; Phillip L Palmbos; Andrew J Green; Tricia L Velting; Anna Brzostek; Malgorzata Korycka-Machala; Steve Cresawn; Jaroslaw Dziadek; Graham F Hatfull; Thomas E Wilson; Aidan J Doherty
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  39 in total

1.  Mutations in the Bacillus subtilis beta clamp that separate its roles in DNA replication from mismatch repair.

Authors:  Nicole M Dupes; Brian W Walsh; Andrew D Klocko; Justin S Lenhart; Heather L Peterson; David A Gessert; Cassie E Pavlick; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Mismatch repair causes the dynamic release of an essential DNA polymerase from the replication fork.

Authors:  Andrew D Klocko; Jeremy W Schroeder; Brian W Walsh; Justin S Lenhart; Margery L Evans; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 3.  DNA damage responses in prokaryotes: regulating gene expression, modulating growth patterns, and manipulating replication forks.

Authors:  Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Red light activates the sigmaB-mediated general stress response of Bacillus subtilis via the energy branch of the upstream signaling cascade.

Authors:  Marcela Avila-Pérez; Jeroen B van der Steen; Remco Kort; Klaas J Hellingwerf
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Roles of Bacillus subtilis RecA, Nucleotide Excision Repair, and Translesion Synthesis Polymerases in Counteracting Cr(VI)-Promoted DNA Damage.

Authors:  Fernando Santos-Escobar; Hilda C Leyva-Sánchez; Norma Ramírez-Ramírez; Armando Obregón-Herrera; Mario Pedraza-Reyes
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Hydroxyurea induces hydroxyl radical-mediated cell death in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Bryan W Davies; Michael A Kohanski; Lyle A Simmons; Jonathan A Winkler; James J Collins; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  DnaN clamp zones provide a platform for spatiotemporal coupling of mismatch detection to DNA replication.

Authors:  Justin S Lenhart; Anushi Sharma; Manju M Hingorani; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 8.  Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status.

Authors:  Peter E Burby; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Imaging mismatch repair and cellular responses to DNA damage in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Andrew D Klocko; Kaleena M Crafton; Brian W Walsh; Justin S Lenhart; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Co-orientation of replication and transcription preserves genome integrity.

Authors:  Anjana Srivatsan; Ashley Tehranchi; David M MacAlpine; Jue D Wang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.