Literature DB >> 19058686

Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years.

Roland Frankenberger1, Michael Taschner, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Anselm Petschelt, Norbert Krämer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate IPS Empress inlays and onlays over 12 years. The null hypothesis was that different luting resins would have no influence on clinical outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the course of a prospective clinical long-term trial, 96 ceramic inlays and onlays were placed in 34 patients using one adhesive (Syntac) and four different luting composites (Tetric, Variolink Low, Variolink Ultra, Dual Cement). Recalls were carried out by two calibrated investigators using modified USPHS codes and criteria at baseline, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 years.
RESULTS: Fifteen of the 96 restorations had to be replaced (failure rate 16%; Kaplan-Meier); 12 of them suffered bulk fractures. After twelve years of clinical service, significantly more bulk fractures were found when light-curing composite was used for luting (p < 0.05). Fractures were noticed between 3 and 4 years of clinical service and later after 11 to 12 years; aside from those times, no single fracture occurred. Secondary caries was not observed.
CONCLUSION: IPS Empress inlays and onlays exhibited satisfactory clinical outcomes over a 12-year clinical period. Restorations luted with dual-cured resin composites revealed significantly fewer bulk fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19058686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adhes Dent        ISSN: 1461-5185            Impact factor:   2.359


  21 in total

1.  Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth.

Authors:  Matthias J Roggendorf; Bianka Kunzi; Johannes Ebert; Hubert C Roggendorf; Roland Frankenberger; Sven M Reich
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.

Authors:  Marleen Peumans; M Voet; J De Munck; K Van Landuyt; A Van Ende; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Bond strength of composite resin to glass ceramic after saliva contamination.

Authors:  Frank Nikolaus; Martin Wolkewitz; Petra Hahn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: 12-year follow-up.

Authors:  Maria Jacinta Moraes Coelho Santos; Maria Cristina Freitas; Larissa Marinho Azevedo; Gildo Coelho Santos; Maria Fidela Navarro; Carlos Eduardo Francischone; Rafael Francisco Mondelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Light curing through glass ceramics with a second- and a third-generation LED curing unit: effect of curing mode on the degree of conversion of dual-curing resin cements.

Authors:  Simon Flury; Adrian Lussi; Reinhard Hickel; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months.

Authors:  Vanessa Vogl; Karl-Anton Hiller; Wolfgang Buchalla; Marianne Federlin; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years.

Authors:  F A Spitznagel; K J Scholz; J R Strub; K Vach; P C Gierthmuehlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations.

Authors:  Petra C Guess; Stefan Schultheis; Martin Wolkewitz; Yu Zhang; Joerg R Strub
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical evaluation of partial ceramic crowns inserted with RelyX Unicem with or without selective enamel etching. Results after 2 years.

Authors:  Frederike Schenke; Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Daniel Moder; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.