Literature DB >> 19057328

Multicenter clinical assessment of the Raumedic Neurovent-P intracranial pressure sensor: a report by the BrainIT group.

Giuseppe Citerio1, Ian Piper, Iain R Chambers, Davide Galli, Per Enblad, Karl Kiening, Arminas Ragauskas, Juan Sahuquillo, Barbara Gregson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the robustness and zero-drift of an intracranial pressure sensor, Neurovent-P (Raumedic AG, Münchberg, Germany), when used in the clinical environment.
METHODS: A prospective multicenter trial, conforming to the International Organization for Standardization 14155 Standard, was conducted in 6 European BrainIT centers between July 2005 and December 2006. Ninety-nine catheters were used. The study was observational, followed by a centralized sensor bench test after catheter removal.
RESULTS: The mean recorded value before probe insertion was 0.17 +/- 1.1 mm Hg. Readings outside the range +/-1 mm Hg were recorded in only 3 centers on a total of 15 catheters. Complications were minimal and mainly related to the insertion bolt. The mean recorded pressure value at removal was 0.8 +/- 2.2 mm Hg. No relationship was identified between postremoval reading and length of monitoring. The postremoval bench test indicated the probability of a system failure, defined as a drift of more than 3 mm Hg, at a range between 12 and 17%.
CONCLUSION: The Neurovent-P catheter performed well in clinical use in terms of robustness. The majority of technical complications were associated with the bolt fixation technology. Adverse events were rare and clinically nonsignificant. Despite the earlier reported excellent bench test zero-drift rates, under the more demanding clinical conditions, zero-drift rate remains a concern with catheter tip strain gauge technology. This performance is similar, and not superior, to other intracranial pressure devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19057328     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000335148.87042.D7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  15 in total

Review 1.  Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury in the modern era.

Authors:  Llewellyn C Padayachy; Anthony A Figaji; M R Bullock
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Noninvasive assessment of cerebrospinal fluid pressure.

Authors:  Beau B Bruce
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mahmoud Omidbeigi; Monireh-Sadat Mousavi; Sogol Meknatkhah; Maryam Edalatfar; Ausaf Bari; Mahdi Sharif-Alhoseini
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Improved noninvasive intracranial pressure assessment with nonlinear kernel regression.

Authors:  Peng Xu; Magdalena Kasprowicz; Marvin Bergsneider; Xiao Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2009-07-28

5.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods-A Review.

Authors:  P H Raboel; J Bartek; M Andresen; B M Bellander; B Romner
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-08

Review 6.  Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Zacchetti; Sandra Magnoni; Federica Di Corte; Elisa R Zanier; Nino Stocchetti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Pathophysiology and the Monitoring Methods for Cardiac Arrest Associated Brain Injury.

Authors:  Cesar Reis; Onat Akyol; Camila Araujo; Lei Huang; Budbazar Enkhjargal; Jay Malaguit; Vadim Gospodarev; John H Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Baseline pressure errors (BPEs) extensively influence intracranial pressure scores: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  The effect of baseline pressure errors on an intracranial pressure-derived index: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Christopher Hawthorne; Ian Piper
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.