Literature DB >> 1905285

Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli biofilms towards ciprofloxacin: effect of specific growth rate.

D J Evans1, D G Allison, M R Brown, P Gilbert.   

Abstract

Methods of cell culture which enable the control of specific growth rate and expression of iron-regulated membrane proteins within Gram-negative biofilms were employed for various clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa taken from the sputum of cystic fibrosis patients and of a laboratory strain of Escherichia coli. Susceptibility towards ciprofloxacin was assessed as a function of growth-rate for intact biofilms, cells resuspended from the biofilms and also for newly formed daughter cells shed from the biofilm during its growth and development. Patterns of susceptibility with growth rate were compared to those of suspended cultures grown in a chemostat. In all instances the susceptibility of chemostat cultures was directly related to growth rate. Whilst little difference was observed in the susceptibility pattern for P. aeruginosa strains with different observed levels of mucoidness, such populations were generally more susceptible towards ciprofloxacin than those of E. coli. At fast rates of growth P. aeruginosa cells resuspended from biofilms were significantly more resistant than chemostat grown cells. Intact P. aeruginosa biofilms were significantly more resistant than cells resuspended from them. This is in contrast to E. coli, where cells resuspended from biofilm and intact biofilms were, at the slower rates of growth, equivalent and significantly more susceptible than chemostat-grown cells. At high growth rates all methods of E. coli culture produced cells of equivalent susceptibility. For all strains, daughter cells dislodged from the biofilms demonstrated a high level of susceptibility towards ciprofloxacin which was unaffected by growth rate. This sensitivity corresponded to that of the fastest grown cells in the chemostat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1905285     DOI: 10.1093/jac/27.2.177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  63 in total

1.  Interactions between biocide cationic agents and bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  C Campanac; L Pineau; A Payard; G Baziard-Mouysset; C Roques
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Modeling antibiotic tolerance in biofilms by accounting for nutrient limitation.

Authors:  Mark E Roberts; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Potential impact of increased use of biocides in consumer products on prevalence of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Peter Gilbert; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  The relative contributions of physical structure and cell density to the antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria in biofilms.

Authors:  Amy E Kirby; Kimberly Garner; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparative antimicrobial susceptibility of biofilm versus planktonic forms of Salmonella enterica strains isolated from children with gastroenteritis.

Authors:  K Papavasileiou; E Papavasileiou; A Tseleni-Kotsovili; S Bersimis; C Nicolaou; A Ioannidis; S Chatzipanagiotou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Silvia Martins; Filipe Cerca; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gerald B Pier; Rosário Oliveira; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  A three-dimensional computer model of four hypothetical mechanisms protecting biofilms from antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason D Chambless; Stephen M Hunt; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Involvement of a novel efflux system in biofilm-specific resistance to antibiotics.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Thien-Fah Mah
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus growing on fibronectin-coated surfaces to bactericidal antibiotics.

Authors:  C Chuard; P Vaudaux; F A Waldvogel; D P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Quinolone mode of action--new aspects.

Authors:  D C Hooper
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.