Literature DB >> 15980094

Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry.

Nuno Cerca1, Silvia Martins, Filipe Cerca, Kimberly K Jefferson, Gerald B Pier, Rosário Oliveira, Joana Azeredo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively compare the antibiotic susceptibility of biofilms formed by the coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus with the susceptibility of planktonic cultures.
METHODS: Several CoNS strains were grown planktonically or as biofilms to determine the effect of the mode of growth on the level of susceptibility to antibiotics with different mechanisms of action. The utility of a new, rapid colorimetric method that is based on the reduction of a tetrazolium salt (XTT) to measure cell viability was tested by comparison with standard bacterial enumeration techniques. A 6 h kinetic study was performed using dicloxacillin, cefazolin, vancomycin, tetracycline and rifampicin at the peak serum concentration of each antibiotic.
RESULTS: In planktonic cells, inhibitors of cell wall synthesis were highly effective over a 3 h period. Biofilms were much less susceptible than planktonic cultures to all antibiotics tested, particularly inhibitors of cell wall synthesis. The susceptibility to inhibitors of protein and RNA synthesis was affected by the biofilm phenotype to a lesser degree. Standard bacterial enumeration techniques and the XTT method produced equivalent results both in biofilms and planktonic assays.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a more accurate comparison between the antibiotic susceptibilities of planktonic versus biofilm populations, because the cell densities in the two populations were similar and because we measured the concentration required to inhibit bacterial metabolism rather than to eradicate the entire bacterial population. While the biofilm phenotype is highly resistant to antibiotics that target cell wall synthesis, it is fairly susceptible to antibiotics that target RNA and protein synthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15980094      PMCID: PMC1317301          DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  37 in total

Review 1.  A review of experimental measurements of effective diffusive permeabilities and effective diffusion coefficients in biofilms.

Authors:  P S Stewart
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1998-08-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Unexplored reservoirs of pathogenic bacteria: protozoa and biofilms.

Authors:  M R Brown; J Barker
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 3.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  H Ceri; M E Olson; C Stremick; R R Read; D Morck; A Buret
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Antibiotic susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus in biofilms developed in vitro.

Authors:  B Amorena; E Gracia; M Monzón; J Leiva; C Oteiza; M Pérez; J L Alabart; J Hernández-Yago
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Comparison of a 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-t etrazolium hydroxide (XTT) colorimetric method with the standardized National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards method of testing clinical yeast isolates for susceptibility to antifungal agents.

Authors:  S P Hawser; H Norris; C J Jessup; M A Ghannoum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Quantitative analysis of adhesion and biofilm formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Gerald B Pier; Manuel Vilanova; Rosário Oliveira; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 3.992

8.  Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm.

Authors:  W M Dunne; E O Mason; S L Kaplan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection.

Authors:  D De Beer; R Srinivasan; P S Stewart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm as a diffusion barrier to piperacillin.

Authors:  B D Hoyle; J Alcantara; J W Costerton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  65 in total

1.  Efficacy of a broad host range lytic bacteriophage against E. coli adhered to urothelium.

Authors:  Sanna Sillankorva; Dulce Oliveira; Alexandra Moura; Mariana Henriques; Alberta Faustino; Ana Nicolau; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Antibiotic resistance in an in vitro subgingival biofilm model.

Authors:  M J Sedlacek; C Walker
Journal:  Oral Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2007-10

3.  Metal ions weaken the hydrophobicity and antibiotic resistance of Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610 biofilms.

Authors:  Carolina Falcón García; Martin Kretschmer; Carlos N Lozano-Andrade; Markus Schönleitner; Anna Dragoŝ; Ákos T Kovács; Oliver Lieleg
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 7.290

4.  Contribution of phosphoglucosamine mutase to determination of bacterial cell morphology in Streptococcus gordonii.

Authors:  Kisaki Shimazu; Yukihiro Takahashi; Hiroyuki Karibe; Fusako Mitsuhashi; Kiyoshi Konishi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Sustained Nitric Oxide-Releasing Nanoparticles Interfere with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Adhesion and Biofilm Formation in a Rat Central Venous Catheter Model.

Authors:  Mircea Radu Mihu; Vitor Cabral; Rodney Pattabhi; Moses T Tar; Kelvin P Davies; Adam J Friedman; Luis R Martinez; Joshua D Nosanchuk
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Alternative strategies for proof-of-principle studies of antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Axel Dalhoff; Andrej Weintraub; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vitro activities of a novel nanoemulsion against Burkholderia and other multidrug-resistant cystic fibrosis-associated bacterial species.

Authors:  John J LiPuma; Sivaprakash Rathinavelu; Bridget K Foster; Jordan C Keoleian; Paul E Makidon; Linda M Kalikin; James R Baker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Effect of bacteriocin and exopolysaccharides isolated from probiotic on P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm.

Authors:  Vivek Sharma; Kusum Harjai; Geeta Shukla
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.099

9.  Effect of water-aging on the antimicrobial activities of an ORMOSIL-containing orthodontic acrylic resin.

Authors:  Shi-Qiang Gong; D Jeevanie Epasinghe; Bin Zhou; Li-Na Niu; Kirk A Kimmerling; Frederick A Rueggeberg; Cynthia K Y Yiu; Jing Mao; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  Molecular Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis: an Update.

Authors:  Jenell S Coleman; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.