Literature DB >> 19049966

ATR and H2AX cooperate in maintaining genome stability under replication stress.

Rebecca A Chanoux1, Bu Yin, Karen A Urtishak, Amma Asare, Craig H Bassing, Eric J Brown.   

Abstract

Chromosomal abnormalities are frequently caused by problems encountered during DNA replication. Although the ATR-Chk1 pathway has previously been implicated in preventing the collapse of stalled replication forks into double-strand breaks (DSB), the importance of the response to fork collapse in ATR-deficient cells has not been well characterized. Herein, we demonstrate that, upon stalled replication, ATR deficiency leads to the phosphorylation of H2AX by ATM and DNA-PKcs and to the focal accumulation of Rad51, a marker of homologous recombination and fork restart. Because H2AX has been shown to play a facilitative role in homologous recombination, we hypothesized that H2AX participates in Rad51-mediated suppression of DSBs generated in the absence of ATR. Consistent with this model, increased Rad51 focal accumulation in ATR-deficient cells is largely dependent on H2AX, and dual deficiencies in ATR and H2AX lead to synergistic increases in chromatid breaks and translocations. Importantly, the ATM and DNA-PK phosphorylation site on H2AX (Ser(139)) is required for genome stabilization in the absence of ATR; therefore, phosphorylation of H2AX by ATM and DNA-PKcs plays a pivotal role in suppressing DSBs during DNA synthesis in instances of ATR pathway failure. These results imply that ATR-dependent fork stabilization and H2AX/ATM/DNA-PKcs-dependent restart pathways cooperatively suppress double-strand breaks as a layered response network when replication stalls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19049966      PMCID: PMC2645842          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M806739200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  62 in total

1.  ATR inhibition selectively sensitizes G1 checkpoint-deficient cells to lethal premature chromatin condensation.

Authors:  P Nghiem; P K Park; Y Kim ; C Vaziri; S L Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, induces chromosomal instability and breaks at common fragile sites.

Authors:  S G Durkin; M F Arlt; N G Howlett; T W Glover
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Ali Jazayeri; Jacob Falck; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek; Graeme C M Smith; Jiri Lukas; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2005-12-04       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage.

Authors:  T T Paull; E P Rogakou; V Yamazaki; C U Kirchgessner; M Gellert; W M Bonner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000 Jul 27-Aug 10       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations.

Authors:  Jennifer A Cobb; Thomas Schleker; Vanesa Rojas; Lotte Bjergbaek; José Antonio Tercero; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks.

Authors:  Kristina Trenz; Eloise Smith; Sarah Smith; Vincenzo Costanzo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality.

Authors:  E J Brown; D Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Collaborative roles of gammaH2AX and the Rad51 paralog Xrcc3 in homologous recombinational repair.

Authors:  Eiichiro Sonoda; Guang Yu Zhao; Masaoki Kohzaki; Pawan Kumar Dhar; Koji Kikuchi; Christophe Redon; Duane R Pilch; William M Bonner; Atsushi Nakano; Masami Watanabe; Tatsuo Nakayama; Shunichi Takeda; Yasunari Takami
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-11-22

10.  A conserved pathway to activate BRCA1-dependent ubiquitylation at DNA damage sites.

Authors:  Jolanta Polanowska; Julie S Martin; Tatiana Garcia-Muse; Mark I R Petalcorin; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  73 in total

1.  Wip1 directly dephosphorylates gamma-H2AX and attenuates the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Hyukjin Cha; Julie M Lowe; Henghong Li; Ji-Seon Lee; Galina I Belova; Dmitry V Bulavin; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  The membrane tethered matrix metalloproteinase MT1-MMP triggers an outside-in DNA damage response that impacts chemo- and radiotherapy responses of breast cancer.

Authors:  Varsha Thakur; Keman Zhang; Alyssa Savadelis; Patrick Zmina; Brittany Aguila; Scott M Welford; Fadi Abdul-Karim; Kristen W Bonk; Ruth A Keri; Barbara Bedogni
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Combining ATR suppression with oncogenic Ras synergistically increases genomic instability, causing synthetic lethality or tumorigenesis in a dosage-dependent manner.

Authors:  Oren Gilad; Barzin Y Nabet; Ryan L Ragland; David W Schoppy; Kevin D Smith; Amy C Durham; Eric J Brown
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  Alexandre Maréchal; Lee Zou
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 5.  Targeting DNA repair in cancer: current state and novel approaches.

Authors:  Apostolos Klinakis; Dimitris Karagiannis; Theodoros Rampias
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  More forks on the road to replication stress recovery.

Authors:  Chris Allen; Amanda K Ashley; Robert Hromas; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.216

Review 7.  Translating pharmacodynamic biomarkers from bench to bedside: analytical validation and fit-for-purpose studies to qualify multiplex immunofluorescent assays for use on clinical core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Allison Marrero; Scott Lawrence; Deborah Wilsker; Andrea Regier Voth; Robert J Kinders
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Zika Virus Infection Induces DNA Damage Response in Human Neural Progenitors That Enhances Viral Replication.

Authors:  Christy Hammack; Sarah C Ogden; Joseph C Madden; Angelica Medina; Chongchong Xu; Ernest Phillips; Yuna Son; Allaura Cone; Serena Giovinazzi; Ruth A Didier; David M Gilbert; Hongjun Song; Guoli Ming; Zhexing Wen; Margo A Brinton; Akash Gunjan; Hengli Tang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  NER initiation factors, DDB2 and XPC, regulate UV radiation response by recruiting ATR and ATM kinases to DNA damage sites.

Authors:  Alo Ray; Keisha Milum; Aruna Battu; Gulzar Wani; Altaf A Wani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-02-17

10.  Tim-Tipin dysfunction creates an indispensible reliance on the ATR-Chk1 pathway for continued DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Kevin D Smith; Michael A Fu; Eric J Brown
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.